IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v4v6interim] Fragmentation Options in NAT6 presentation

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 09 October 2008 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BD73A6A48; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF693A6A48 for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kyk75Jj3td63 for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190D73A689D for <v4v6interim@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n4so103309wag.5 for <v4v6interim@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uEG29J0WtcK9niF5TQ1N81FFNeHHdALBqRfGCkWYROU=; b=T/GFhXOxZlntAAyseqeKg40WS0Tjs69cGh4zW6qgLZyg+/0XWFWmh3Trf58yhQImaq AbLqLyF0ziAhx8UMXwQWQKbUEVACSsz1II2mbFonHmUB6+Nr+04bpT8NMO20g6Z7I7gD 8Z/VDwoQ1w1AzfG/TyJ1NeHOtU15BCO5EENFs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Iq95P6bvHzYg6mNdCqrn87wYbg0PJziVPAErDqA+xaSQiuUoSE62sUI4ixp/eLTaCv idkwYJbX6iemA/N8ltwOAiERWrjU+t/EJ48y8Fr1sDNbXTZf9gIZewm+IyJKvXlm8+6b l9hlKDVoEe3GwtbqtBhpf1rlUJjz1U2U5enq0=
Received: by 10.114.150.1 with SMTP id x1mr848769wad.71.1223583845593; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?130.216.38.124? (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l38sm823482waf.1.2008.10.09.13.24.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48EE685D.8090408@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:23:57 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
References: <B2FE551A-5BA9-4D46-B619-EF694015D5AF@tahi.org> <48E6AEBD.9090205@gmail.com> <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A03011DB57C@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com> <200810071047.56810.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> <48EDFC73.7080404@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <48EDFC73.7080404@ericsson.com>
Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] Fragmentation Options in NAT6 presentation
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org

...
> When it comes to "safe", no value is truly safe and that is the issue.
> Things starting to get really high success rates when you go down below
> 500 bytes, i.e. 576 - reasonable overhead. But even 1400 is to big in a
> number of places for IPv4 networks. 

Yes, I'm just fighting a link a few hops from me that seems to have
an MTU of 1232, which transitions IPv6 into a big black hole...

   Brian
_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status