Re: [v4v6interim] BOF discussions

Rémi Després 写道:
> Xing Li   (m/j/a) 10/4/08 1:19 AM:
>> Rémi Després 写道:
>>> Marc Blanchet   (m/j/a) 10/3/08 3:15 PM:
>>>> R�mi Despr�s a �crit :
>>>>> I support Fred's suggestion of separating discussion spaces for 
>>>>> what is
>>>>> specific to tunneling and what is specific to translation.
>>>>>
>>>>> In my understanding:
>>>>> - NAT64, NAT46, and what concerns ISP infrastructure NATs (CGNs) 
>>>>> but not
>>>>> CPE NATs, would be in v4v6-xlat
>>>>> - A+P, IVI, SAM, and tunneling aspects of DS lite  would be in 
>>>>> v4v6-Xlat
>>>>
>>>> s/v4v6-xlat/v4v6-tunnel/  right?
>> IVI should be in v4v6-xlat cat. xing
>
> Right: IVI is indeed a translation solution.
> Apologies for the mistake.
Thanks.
>
> In my understanding,  is only if it is extended to support IPv4
> over IPv6, and also port multiplexing (respectively sections 4.8 and 
> 6.2 of your draft-xli-behave-ivi-00) that commonality with a tunneling 
> approach like SAM is likely to be significant.
Oh. I see the reason. In draft-xli-behave-ivi-00, we discussed the case 
of double IVI (IPv4-IPv6-IPv4). We may compare SAM and double IVI in the 
future.

Regards,

xing

>
> Best regards.
>
> RD
>
>

_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim