Re: [v4v6interim] BOF discussions

Alain, is right to suppose that the Softwire charter has been revised 
AFTER Montreal?

- If not, other goals and milestones than "Submit softwires MIB to the 
IESG" would clearly be missing.)

- If yes, the question remains: can we see the revised charter you seem 
to know, even in provisional form?

RD

Wes Beebee (wbeebee)   (m/j/a) 10/3/08 6:25 PM:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/current/msg00687.html
> 
> - Wes 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rémi Després
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 12:19 PM
> To: Alain Durand
> Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] BOF discussions
> 
> This seems indeed better than a BOF.
> Is the new charter available?
> 
> RD
> 
> Alain Durand   (m/j/a) 10/3/08 5:04 PM:
>> Our Ads have re-chartered the Softwire wg to address the tunneling + 
>> nat44 case, so it is unclear to me why we would need a bof in that 
>> particular space when the working group will be meeting in Minneapolis.
>>
>>   - Alain. 

_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim