Re: [v4v6interim] BOF discussions

Xing Li   (m/j/a) 10/4/08 1:19 AM:
> Rémi Després 写道:
>> Marc Blanchet   (m/j/a) 10/3/08 3:15 PM:
>>> R�mi Despr�s a �crit :
>>>> I support Fred's suggestion of separating discussion spaces for what is
>>>> specific to tunneling and what is specific to translation.
>>>>
>>>> In my understanding:
>>>> - NAT64, NAT46, and what concerns ISP infrastructure NATs (CGNs) but 
>>>> not
>>>> CPE NATs, would be in v4v6-xlat
>>>> - A+P, IVI, SAM, and tunneling aspects of DS lite  would be in 
>>>> v4v6-Xlat
>>>
>>> s/v4v6-xlat/v4v6-tunnel/  right?
> IVI should be in v4v6-xlat cat. xing

Right: IVI is indeed a translation solution.
Apologies for the mistake.

In my understanding,  is only if it is extended to support IPv4
over IPv6, and also port multiplexing (respectively sections 4.8 and 6.2 
of your draft-xli-behave-ivi-00) that commonality with a tunneling 
approach like SAM is likely to be significant.

Best regards.

RD

_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim