Re: [v4v6interim] Potential interoperability issue
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Sat, 04 October 2008 20:36 UTC
Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4DA3A67B3; Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6852A3A677D for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.515
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7exWOs-dIi1P for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75F03A6405 for <v4v6interim@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,361,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="168836766"
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Oct 2008 20:37:25 +0000
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (sj-core-4.cisco.com [171.68.223.138]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m94KbORp001228; Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:37:24 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m94KbOI9003100; Sat, 4 Oct 2008 20:37:24 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:37:24 -0700
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-220.cisco.com ([10.32.244.220]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:37:24 -0700
Message-Id: <74408D36-502A-439F-A097-8569C4B8DE06@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E6509A8-CE7E-4807-ABC3-C5A705676B7C@muada.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:37:22 -0700
References: <E0F13238-A5C2-4BEE-BE28-7FFCFEFB3FDC@cisco.com> <4E6509A8-CE7E-4807-ABC3-C5A705676B7C@muada.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Oct 2008 20:37:24.0100 (UTC) FILETIME=[01D21C40:01C92661]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=357; t=1223152644; x=1224016644; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[v4v6interim]=20Potential=20interoperab ility=20issue |Sender:=20; bh=UE/rmfyKXLV5mHwPk+pZ1DH2BXpqorbIcldOQHhrOUI=; b=AYc6ziua0UD6GRMa2kgZwDFY/6YDbAbQ8T3nQcNvMblBgSbMnBCWgwaAG0 Pc6ngTCzkiltRjwnUdvuQ6s/IWgO5XDSO1mL72dVSXD7KObwdHTqX2VK0rPO lT3aEAptox;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] Potential interoperability issue
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
On Oct 3, 2008, at 3:17 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > using a dual stack SMTP server as a forwarder makes much more sense. Gee, you make it sound as if I were arguing against dual stack. I'm merely noting that dual stack isn't being deployed at the rate one would hope for and that my customers are looking for a translation solution. _______________________________________________ v4v6interim mailing list v4v6interim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim
- [v4v6interim] Potential interoperability issue Fred Baker
- Re: [v4v6interim] Potential interoperability issue james woodyatt
- Re: [v4v6interim] Potential interoperability issue Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v4v6interim] Potential interoperability issue Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [v4v6interim] Potential interoperability issue Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v4v6interim] Potential interoperability issue Fred Baker
- Re: [v4v6interim] Potential interoperability issue Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v4v6interim] Potential interoperability issue Ed Koehler Jr