Re: [v4v6interim] Single namespace

On Oct 2, 2008, at 06:22, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
> Such a person might also argue that supporting v4 users' use of v6- 
> only systems is just not a practical goal given the costs, and if  
> they want to use those services, that will give them an
> excellent incentive to add IPv6 support; so for practical reasons,  
> we shouldn't try to solve that scenario.

The corollary is a better argument: if application service operators  
would like to be reachable and available to IPv4-only clients, and  
making such services IPv6-only is just not a practical goal given the  
costs, then that will give such operators an excellent incentive to  
run a dual-stack site.

--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering

_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim