IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v4v6interim] BOF discussions

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Sat, 04 October 2008 07:48 UTC

Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA92D3A6861; Sat, 4 Oct 2008 00:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5462D3A6861 for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Oct 2008 00:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.069]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YHUJCxjkS-41 for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Oct 2008 00:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:2:5::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3EA3A6849 for <v4v6interim@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Oct 2008 00:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (82-192-90-29.leasedsl.net [82.192.90.29] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m947meKN028377 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Oct 2008 09:48:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Message-Id: <DD0672C2-CFE2-4806-BF24-67A3F81D9283@muada.com>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <44339B00-681B-4E63-9FE0-F65D3EA23B07@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 00:37:37 +0200
References: <44339B00-681B-4E63-9FE0-F65D3EA23B07@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] BOF discussions
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org

On 2 okt 2008, at 23:13, Fred Baker wrote:

> So various folks are going to be doing a lot of work in email and  
> such in the next few weeks. May I suggest that the ADs schedule a  
> BOF for the translation solution and one for the tunneling solution

Disagree. Like I've been saying for some time now: there is no  
semantic difference between the NAT64&co translation and DS-lite  
translation, only a syntactic difference. There should only be a  
single translation spec that covers both. So discussing the two  
solutions in separate places is likely to be suboptimal. Or make it  
three lists: translation issues / NAT64-specific issues / DS-lite  
specific issues.

> I would also suggest that you set of mailing lists for these BOFs,  
> perhaps called v4v6-xlat and v4v6-tunnel or some such. Announce them  
> to this forum and let people sign up the usual way.

subscribe *

_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status