Re: [v4v6interim] [BEHAVE] [46translation] Proposal for new BEHAVE charter

[Mark Townsley <[e-mail]>]

Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> Mark Townsley skrev:
>   
>> Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>>     
>>> Anyway,
>>>
>>> Are anyone that thinks that NAT66 is so important that it takes
>>> precedence over the NAT46 translator work? If not, can we postpone this
>>> until we are ready to publish something on address family translators?
>>>
>>> The reason I ask the above is that we will have enough work for all the
>>> people in the translator work. Thus trying to avoid splitting the forces
>>> to thinly.
>>>   
>>>       
>> The NAT66 should be relatively straightforward, and could actually help
>> highlight some of the reasons why 46 and 64 become problematic. NAT66 is
>> a question that comes up again and again when talking about deploying
>> IPv6, and I honestly think it would be useful to have a document to
>> point to that brought light to and articulated some of the issues, gave
>> strong warning where necessary, and described what was relatively safe
>> and what not.
>>
>> It doesn't really have to be part of behave though.  Magnus, I fully
>> understand if you are looking at this new behave charter and can't
>> imagine another thing on your plate. As Margaret and others mentioned,
>> this can go through int-area, 6man, or some such.
>>
>>     
>
> Yes, I think that is worth considering. It will still likely take some
> energy from people involved in the translation work. But, as you write
> it might have benefits also.
>
> When it comes to the BEHAVE charter I think there will be additional
> items added further down the road. However, I am trying at this stage
> charter what we know and are certain that we like to work on. Then we
> can do another recharter in a couple of months if necessary. I don't
> think we have fully baked where the NAT66 work belongs and will
> definitely leave it out now. I am trying to meet the goal of having the
> translation work chartered before the meeting.
>   
Thats fine with me, and in the mean time if someone is sitting on their 
hands with nothing to do, write up a good NAT66 document and we'll 
figure out where it should land.

- Mark
> Cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone [phone]
> Färögatan 6                | Fax   [phone]
> S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [e-mail]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>   

_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim