Re: [v4v6interim] BOF discussions

I support Fred's suggestion of separating discussion spaces for what is 
specific to tunneling and what is specific to translation.

In my understanding:
- NAT64, NAT46, and what concerns ISP infrastructure NATs (CGNs) but not 
CPE NATs, would be in v4v6-xlat
- A+P, IVI, SAM, and tunneling aspects of DS lite  would be in v4v6-Xlat
- questions that concern interactions between the two, would remain in 
the current mailing list.

RD

Hemant Singh (shemant)   (m/j/a) 10/3/08 12:19 AM:
> Fred,
> 
> Good suggestion.  However, what if a BOF is needed to discuss a solution
> where both xlat and tunnel are needed?  Do we discuss those in this WG
> mailer or spawn a 3rd new BOF mailer?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Hemant 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org]
> On Behalf Of Fred Baker (fred)
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 5:14 PM
> To: v4v6interim@ietf.org
> Subject: [v4v6interim] BOF discussions
> 
> So various folks are going to be doing a lot of work in email and such
> in the next few weeks. May I suggest that the ADs schedule a BOF for the
> translation solution and one for the tunneling solution (and one for the
> 4-4-4 solution?) separate from WGs, to enable the doc authors to sit
> down together and discuss?
> 
> I would also suggest that you set of mailing lists for these BOFs,
> perhaps called v4v6-xlat and v4v6-tunnel or some such. Announce them to
> this forum and let people sign up the usual way.
> _______________________________________________
> v4v6interim mailing list
> v4v6interim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim
> _______________________________________________
> v4v6interim mailing list
> v4v6interim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim