Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment and draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment

[Giuseppe Fioccola <[e-mail]>]

Hi Shuping,
Thanks for your support.
I will surely include the reference to the relevant 6MAN and V6OPS documents on IPv6 EHs.

Regards,

Giuseppe 

-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 10:57 AM
To: Fred Baker <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment and draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment

Hi Fred, Folks, 

I support the adoption of this work. 

I found the "Call for action" section is very valuable, which lists the aspects that could be further investigated. The WG could work more on these approaches and actions. 

References could be also added in the sections regarding the IPv6 extension headers to refer to the currently ongoing related works. 

Best regards, 
Shuping 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 12:58 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Subject: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment and
> draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
> 
> 
> 
> > On Mar 19, 2021, at 1:39 AM, Paolo Volpato <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> >
> > For lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison, on behalf of the authors of
> draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment I can say we are in favor of the WG
> adoption. Not only is it a good description of the transition technologies to
> IPv6, but it also constitutes a basis for our draft.
> 
> OK, let me put this to the working group. We asked about adoption of
> draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison once before (in January 2020), and
> got essentially no response. It has come up on the list twice since, in July and
> in November. The authors of draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment would like to
> see it adopted. The two sets of authors are disjoint. I therefore have at least
> nine people that would like to see us adopt and publish it. What other folks
> have opinions, pro or con?
> 
> Along the same lines, are there opinions regarding the adoption of
> draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment?
> 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a&q=%22draft-lmhp-v6ops-tr
> ansition-comparison%22
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a&q=%22draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-
> deployment%22

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops