IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IETF 79 Meeting minutes - Draft

Akira Kato <kato@wide.ad.jp> Wed, 17 November 2010 08:47 UTC

Return-Path: <kato@wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45A73A68B8 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:47:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.02
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gs1QxqcuhxYW for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:47:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.kmd.keio.ac.jp (mail.kmd.keio.ac.jp [IPv6:2001:200:167:2e90::164]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF74C3A68A8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:47:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from venice.nezu.wide.ad.jp (unknown [IPv6:2001:200:167:2ec1:21f:3bff:fec6:73bd]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kmd.keio.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B46777FDD7; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:47:56 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by venice.nezu.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C754130908; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:47:56 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:47:56 +0900
Message-Id: <20101117.174756.123405121.kato@wide.ad.jp>
To: aservin@lacnic.net
From: Akira Kato <kato@wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <9222B727-7F0C-4A73-BEAB-41EA3725E9EC@lacnic.net>
References: <4CDF62F4.50308@bogus.com> <20101116.202916.337815455.kato@wide.ad.jp> <9222B727-7F0C-4A73-BEAB-41EA3725E9EC@lacnic.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IETF 79 Meeting minutes - Draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:47:14 -0000

The data is just a quick plot to help the shared address
discussion. As AS112 is highly distributed with anycasting, the graph
might not indicate global trend. I'd try to analyze slightly more
general way and report the result back to this list with an URL.
Please allow me some more time to work it.

-- Akira Kato

From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IETF 79 Meeting minutes - Draft
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:20:25 -0200

> Akira,
> 
> 	Would it be worthy to see a CDF of the data of 10/8 and 172.16/12?
> 
> 	Also, are you publishing this plot in a blog or something? It would be good as a reference for the future.
> 
> Best wishes,
> .as
> 	
> 
> On 16 Nov 2010, at 09:29, Akira Kato wrote:
> 
>> 
>> In Beijing Meeting, there were some discussion on how RFC1918 space
>> was used.
>> 
>> I counted 29 million DNS PTR queries of one of the AS112 servers for
>> 39.5hours in Nov 15-16, 2010 and plot the frequency in each /16 chunk
>> (Red: 10.0.0.0/8, Green: 172.16.0.0/12, Blue: 192.168.0.0/16).
>> 
>> Asssuming these PTR queries were generated and leaked to the AS112
>> server based on the real usage, we may conclude that entire space are
>> in use while degree varies by the address.
>> 
>> -- Akira Kato
>> <rfc1918.png>_______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email