IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Chair decision on WGLC for draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-04

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Sun, 05 November 2023 20:41 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C66C15C2B4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 12:41:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X9QgEpKO2Db6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 12:41:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20F0CC15199B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 12:41:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1699216884; x=1730752884; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=IQ9Wa9uXx/w29YfV0pfDOFKx2KK10Zz/E0g8DxJ5WwU=; b=NGfirEUuu8UDsUf4I0EyADS3reTlp1AVipCkSmno5Y/kgHU2p7DpqsUZ Zr+u+/LxILxB7jCRJe9ZbgfNinMTAeSSY3PfPA2Ind6FQm3b2GHG1bSyK Kr1GEDqOwG2oegOB+eGUEvu8XkQARJrzQoALo6UOwFOF27JFtBQwVYBRq +NQapEnwPpHhtRU3puHNzqjBK1hXGkzN71zfk5FgsAMxtO9PbwRtMeUO/ O/szqN+O4m/lwTHASLPYSyLDwOwjxY5kgJ4ZtpqtUFPi/FKmufJaeu89x ZMUJ17JekUWyUYnrfashLliTSvFI/T+k7hcSI5dzvF24+YXIaraKOLpVX Q==;
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: BW/0IDReQ6uoujJDNv9eUg==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: w8A0l7jhRHOyMt10SkRZ1A==
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Nov 2023 21:41:21 +0100
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C824270E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 21:41:21 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1499D405B3; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 21:41:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 0AFE978A6; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 21:41:21 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2023 21:41:20 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Martin Hun??k <martin.hunek@tul.cz>, Xipengxiao <xipengxiao=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, V6Ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <ZUf98PIPU0-FrLGJ@Space.Net>
References: <e078c90495b54390a3fb4c7bae143b05@huawei.com> <2289823.aiPYRZItUj@asclepius.adm.tul.cz> <3b9de8c77da7455491487e786dbe493a@huawei.com> <2031501.h9gRbJKcGU@asclepius.adm.tul.cz> <ZUfUgDoKTSogvUEN@Space.Net> <CAN-Dau16mgLokB2WR1uQn33gYp4Qzo4rF4kHyhinRpknr+V1eA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LwZXY5bV92u1pHc2"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Dau16mgLokB2WR1uQn33gYp4Qzo4rF4kHyhinRpknr+V1eA@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/0FIfxVaVdR4BXoKElyLC8t9Ii4g>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Chair decision on WGLC for draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-04
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2023 20:41:29 -0000

Hi,

On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 01:40:01PM -0600, David Farmer wrote:
> Your argument above is hypocritical. If a /64 per phone is justified for
> cell carriers, it should be justice for end-user customers as well. If it's
> not okay for end-users, it should not be okay for cell carriers either.

Maybe you need to acquaint yourself to the realities of address
distribution hierarchies, outside large universities holding a /32?

> If a cell carrier can get enough /64s to have one for every customer's cell
> phone, then end-users should be able to do the same. If RIPE has to change
> its policies to allow this, then so be it.

You do not want everybody to become a RIR member, because of obvious
implications on routing table size.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status