IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-03

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Fri, 20 October 2017 10:01 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34A213219F; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 03:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNk4ZyfoQDfw; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 03:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7CD7132F76; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 03:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.98.237] (unknown [189.3.90.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9DDC806E2; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:01:22 +0200 (CEST)
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering@ietf.org>
References: <8C3BB7BE-4E84-4D44-8DA9-BBE80EA51752@nokia.com> <2C2BE7A7-C885-4B38-ADA4-B29EADEED387@gmail.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <91dcdfa8-a4fd-c2b4-9371-defa2b24c551@si6networks.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:53:00 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2C2BE7A7-C885-4B38-ADA4-B29EADEED387@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/0Pq7QNf2ESVPXXmjm1Ybd3fX8z8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-03
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 10:01:29 -0000

Hello, Bob,

On 10/04/2017 06:38 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
> 
> I also don’t think this is ready for a w.g. last call.
> 
> It doesn’t reference the new version of the IPv6 specification
> RFC8200.  There were a number of clarifications in RFC8200 regarding
> extension headers that may require changes in the draft.

We talked a bit about this. Best option seems to be to keep the current
text and add text regarding the changes in RFC8200 -- at the end of th
day, an operator will have to deal with both RFC2460 and RFC8200
implementations.

Thoughts?

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email