IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)

Michael Breuer <michael.breuer@ilsf.eu> Tue, 06 August 2024 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <michael.breuer@ilsf.eu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95160C1524DC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 06:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ilsf.eu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qe6HsU6_p15F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 06:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail01.ilsf.eu (mail01.ilsf.eu [94.130.111.76]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCC97C157938 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 06:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ilsf.eu; s=20200614-01; t=1722950316; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NhZUTurLjI05wnmzCDhOayA+5iH4kabmumUa+MzlV4w=; b=xpuOjG9FwiwuoeQd/d12aVn0HMspLOl7HDQtG18hwBPlZasqPY6y2oMv2b/zVqoKumlOGJ WgHFRlSw+c6Fqrd6mOod7vdUosHhDfiJMLGLo8Qvp86E9vQsDFDHit55h0kCOFUDTrKreU BHD7fDqBbhLz0I9DoZZXYld6yObgCQA=
Received: from smtpclient.apple (2001-4dd6-5dee-9c-dc2b-9ea0-8371-c733.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de [2001:4dd6:5dee:9c:dc2b:9ea0:8371:c733]) by mail01.ilsf.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6608ad78 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 6 Aug 2024 15:18:35 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51\))
From: Michael Breuer <michael.breuer@ilsf.eu>
In-Reply-To: <CACyFTPHaELmgB4tyyHxG53TZQuD9g2tOv=zwQTeKjBkiceJ2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2024 15:18:16 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4D02AE2D-1971-4AA6-BA67-BBD2ACA33837@ilsf.eu>
References: <CAN-Dau1R=oszbFx40a2U+Cnx354vi44Osk4ruuGcGDodzYKo7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAFU7BASyraNzL3htxxGkbeo5akCS-fLeH8_49GFb-fTc4TB0fQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau2wNs=6QO6+vHHb0OQj2GV1HRe76BHo4rdomjCFUBES_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=NaGHxwQ29Z_Uk2royyb-Nix21kcY+12JC9=FDHtOQ+A@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau1+WyvDyxXZBEKFVQ=Pjf38-ku_V9WbmLRBuys5v2R3Pg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=1bXJrUNvSOe322SdTHGfe-Odw67NSnTE4NY0ZGyqJ8g@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau3WdgCQFurWJjiC-Tr4a5hj25pjOvhNG8O=tne=JwA0eA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nKo2b1XyW1-bBvAk9N2DuDkqbury6d+z900P+FxQTzrg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau2vMX4-6BD-SLQYk-DDj8ia3ySSLwLdMrRAU1canMjJsw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFU7BARVGGCaD-aO2Y+tE0c=JDY0kCjxmfZ-yUeSuR8S554omg@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2w9PcN4ej6_Ly-jLoKcMeWP+-UA00xGHPG9jm2dz4_F2A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nmk9+G_QadBV8D=Ty_0sxMFNYxijd+CERr7w8YWhJaxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wAjamRg4sNnpAF0KBB5SrHgJUxcoy1rXvdrR3SWC3xog@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr33a9LZ4A0UZsFUMsR-SZ2GfO1q-2Cifts+KsAd_g5ObQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2z8S426+G+AbpPDjrLdbmYDsArXaoAFMRuSbx41weWoHw@mail.gmail.com> <DB9PR07MB77717BE049C3B0DA943F19CCD6BE2@DB9PR07MB7771.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAPt1N1nNC0HEGOxP3-8-G+wdLxGywCOH-_4W7fodM+0YmtLcRA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJgLMKuwtpSpF2JnR5dYfh6hmo+-LunbJxe7Z6WTTaNh=nAtVw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1kx79vyHnU-=tfGLrRDgiRiKTu0D1aYdYn_vYTQUMK99w@mail.gmail.com> <AF94B18E-9173-4D6F-AEFB-BA8E3F860ABE@ilsf.eu> <CACyFTPHaELmgB4tyyHxG53TZQuD9g2tOv=zwQTeKjBkiceJ2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daryll Swer <contact@daryllswer.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51)
Message-ID-Hash: X42RJJKX5GNATAWQA5NAM7SA3OWH456Y
X-Message-ID-Hash: X42RJJKX5GNATAWQA5NAM7SA3OWH456Y
X-MailFrom: michael.breuer@ilsf.eu
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/0bN_e56_hOWs2bu-DI9UxFSd_pg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>

Hej Daryll,

> On 6. Aug 2024, at 01:28, Daryll Swer <contact@daryllswer.com> wrote:
> 
> > I’m currently struggling with a CE router that receives a /48 from the ISP and, whatever an inner router requests via IA_PD, this device always delegates /57.
> 
> Can you share more details about the make/model of this router that does

It’s a DSL Router from a popular European brand.

> this /57 delegation by default

A "/57 delegation by default” could be mistaken as a configuration option - but that’s not the case. It’s hard coded in the CE Router.

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status