IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-vyncke-v6ops-ipv6-only-thin-clients

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Sat, 27 June 2015 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0701ACC89 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vRnwdDGkq7se for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFD1C1AC3FB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1843; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1435447249; x=1436656849; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=QJKkQp3Sl1FJa1IzpQzGnijF9/cU+mSHJWmAIcvzURk=; b=dq7Cz1LF4nmqq/yr89755WivcusbHjQ5EUTk/2OOgRAkIbNvBdZQuq+J 1T1cG8VktL3e8VqknnBQax2Sa/T2i4wbOwMOiPNygXv+9FmT6ntwvCeSr o4TNPacF+2+4FmJpKnagrPaKn9lKnRv9K+xC7Gi1fSFLYOkFtSd/RpuvS I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CmAwA1L49V/5BdJa1bgxFUXwa9JgmBZoV4AoElOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEIgEBAQMBOj8FBwQCAQgRBAEBAQoUCQcyFAkIAgQBDQUIiB8IDc4pAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4tKhFUxBwaDEYEUBZQEAYRYiDZCg0+DDYwGg10mg3pvgUaBAgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,691,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="163533426"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2015 23:20:49 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t5RNKnMi028253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 27 Jun 2015 23:20:49 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.6.34]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 18:20:48 -0500
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-vyncke-v6ops-ipv6-only-thin-clients
Thread-Index: AQHQsM8JGymCZ6zFa0y/8W6u8YSFe53BGauA///e0rA=
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 23:20:47 +0000
Message-ID: <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B89168AC6EE@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
References: <201506271147.t5RBl19P016483@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <4C545B41-FE57-4B99-9635-B02BE22CC1BA@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C545B41-FE57-4B99-9635-B02BE22CC1BA@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.243.51]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/15LgnMd2f9EwDqBhJNZkYsDkKjI>
Cc: "draft-vyncke-v6ops-ipv6-only-thin-clients@tools.ietf.org" <draft-vyncke-v6ops-ipv6-only-thin-clients@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-vyncke-v6ops-ipv6-only-thin-clients
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 23:20:53 -0000

The Preboot section needs more work.  Only if the deployment does not include a router which sends an RA, does the preboot use DHCPv6.   Magically, the node would know to initiate DHCPv6 and preboot...  If the deployment includes a router, the node can generate a global IPv6 address using SLAAC and then use tftpv6 to fetch its OS tar ball and be done.   

Maybe when we have at least 5-6 serious issues collected we can consider the document for v6ops WG adoption.

Thanks,

Hemant


-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker (fred)
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 3:59 PM
To: v6ops list
Cc: draft-vyncke-v6ops-ipv6-only-thin-clients@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-vyncke-v6ops-ipv6-only-thin-clients


> On Jun 27, 2015, at 4:47 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> A new draft has been posted, at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vyncke-v6ops-ipv6-only-thin-clients. Please take a look at it and comment.

You have seen my comments about the developing agenda for IETF 93. This is a draft that I'm specifically looking for feedback on. If there is interest in the working group, we may have a few minutes to discuss it f2f; in any event, I think it needs discussion on the list, and I'd be happy to see it discussed somewhere else if that works better.

The draft is a quick read, and I suspect covers only the most glaring issues in IPv6-only networks. Folks that are running IPv6-only handsets in mobile networks are dealing with various issues, no doubt, and we have several wireline networks that are experimenting with IPv6-only with an IPv4 overlay. What are the IPv6 issues (not IPv4 issues) that we are seeing with hosts in IPv6-only networks?

Your comments please...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email