IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient

"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Fri, 24 April 2015 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5771B30ED for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0x3zAKvR2hCo for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.sbone.de (mx1.sbone.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:3ffc::401:25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 140471B30E3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08EB625D3A42 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:08:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F151C76FE2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:08:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de
Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4yQlwfjfbjUQ for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:08:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4420:cabc:c8ff:fe8b:4fe6] (orange-tun0-ula.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4420:cabc:c8ff:fe8b:4fe6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8B4DC76FDE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:08:46 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <D15FCA8A.A3592%Lee.Howard@twcable.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:08:44 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <8A272B9D-BFF5-4F84-BC9C-52C49B8D231F@lists.zabbadoz.net>
References: <CAD6AjGT-hG-uvRQvRosrZtfrf0Nb8ne9jy=tD9oh=5zNM42Xsg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTcKgK8W+VB1H5EQpHaYiKVYXqOz_2RS-w_CiTf9kL2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe530+OVZrFZVaYh1-zoRDvJhUd0rf4sx6a2nO8SvKmm6zg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPi140PQ+TF0rED_bQPeS=Fj415qt0-zE2RdGnEL34PAzHyx6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTjXAeMF6pw5MO2Jrf9B8LJ48D3m1YTVkdBe=_OHjtroQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe51TCqU2eMP4LS3DooZxQDAPD95OVJDXbiU7qvuvKCMq+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2=zc57+pOA9TFs+0azw0ZR1g67+08T=9eZPHjGXBvgFQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe53T_30pj7xxwNs=mWEnd=do6oiq3KgN=U-gHLrLF-gG7Q@mail.gmail.com> <D1441574.4C168%wesley.george@twcable.com> <CAD6AjGQrzoBJrqQfKO0N8Ji=oJ-ZP6Sn88sXf=opJ6bYVmTDZg@mail.gmail.com> <552102B0.6070904@cernet.edu.cn> <35D97B17-8E83-43CF-ABEF-122572F1321A@eircom.net> <552369C8.5000801@cernet.edu.cn> <CADhXe51BDuPhc8wdKGmRiBfSnrz7PMtqYXaoDO+5cwLx_xW2tw@mail.gmail.com> <55290E26.8080500@cernet.edu.cn> <CADhXe50zz9EtNtifMh+tN9XT-jKCTJB=vsQ6uG515iddOo7f2Q@mail.gmail.com> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303 E8C63A@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <67A2A6E4-0603-4E84-8534-EA6C706C6D5D@lists.zabbadoz.net> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303E8CBAB@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <0C3D10F1-B8AF-4097-91C6-D92CDDD5978D@nominum.com> <D15D242E.4E4C7%wesley.george@twcable.com> <64D1E18A-036D-426C-A4A9-8202BE66F403@nominum.com> <CO2PR04MB585018697B4DE32875EAFCEFEEC0@CO2PR04MB585.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <D15FCA8A.A3592%Lee.Howard@twcable.com>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/1GtbyBqKfsq4emfgO92Olui45FE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:09:06 -0000

> On 24 Apr 2015, at 14:38 , Howard, Lee <lee.howard@twcable.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/24/15, 9:33 AM, "Metzler, Dan J" <dan-metzler@uiowa.edu> wrote:
> 
>> [DJM]
>> I see one common theme in this discussion:  "IPv4 literals are harmful."
> 
> I think I read consensus on that statement.
> I'm not sure there is consensus that the IETF is the right place to make
> such a statement. There might be; I think we need a document to discuss to
> see if there is consensus.
> Somebody needs to write it for us to discuss it. Hint, hint.

Yeah, sunset4 got as far as that to my understanding:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sunset4-gapanalysis-07#section-7

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email