IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 04 November 2015 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CAD1B340C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 12:19:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ckB6L4PQcY9U for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 12:19:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B80341B3409 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 12:19:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1928462F15 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 21:19:02 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C51B660128 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 21:19:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 45724 invoked by uid 1007); 4 Nov 2015 21:19:01 +0100
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 21:19:01 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Message-ID: <20151104201901.GA70452@Space.Net>
References: <CAKD1Yr3Qn48eQ1Q4VovCsr_S2+RADRZKzi9qBDoh8G2w6Be+=g@mail.gmail.com> <20151104024731.0DCDE3BC3CBF@rock.dv.isc.org> <D25FB58B.C9B04%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <20151104104208.GL70452@Space.Net> <0EE48C9B-801D-4670-8D02-248789E2F411@umn.edu> <50027DBA-C4C2-4679-8D1C-2992BE7C3B75@delong.com> <20151104170711.GV70452@Space.Net> <ADA388DF-1E4D-43E4-B2EC-7D3E1B93FCD0@delong.com> <20151104195254.GW70452@Space.Net> <307C3852-01BA-425E-A556-1ACAEC646EFC@delong.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n4SASLGpMjXF4n/9"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <307C3852-01BA-425E-A556-1ACAEC646EFC@delong.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/1OxIvARjQMzyNHuDZRc4R9i4V4s>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 20:19:05 -0000

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 05:12:37PM -0300, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > Or the case of destination NAT used for load-balancing...  (still NAT,
> > even if not N:1 source NAPT).
> 
> Unnecessary in IPv6 and not entirely harmless.

Lots of different ways to build loadbalancer exist, and they all have
benefits and drawbacks.  Otherwise people would not use all the variants.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email