Re: [v6ops] Extension Headers / Impact on Security Devices

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 17 June 2015 18:15 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7E71B2CB0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FyrKkWKEM9_G for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F25691B2CAB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1540; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1434564902; x=1435774502; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=gD2Vui0gzmiDhPjfIjQ9i0TLTgAN2evQ7Zo062nLRSs=; b=IeV4U+/73LsUCF44R0IrN/xx7j0yvQd0uIknHO4rZ8xiGEKnLUhL6P6i EOmfvaEuHcYqouSYmoGJYCrj+MuK2jqHb4TDR7d1tQxlCMvHnIVJJVrOc ijXwxuNGPXXhHqQozu56ONmLIWuy0IlBQ9vIfgDmGjw1K4xSe8yws2vcJ I=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 487
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AkBABLuIFV/4wNJK1cDoMCgTMGvVYJh18CgTk4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQiAQEBAwF5BQsCAQgYLjIlAgQOBQ6IGQjJIQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLRIUGB4MXgRQBBJNoAYIhgU2HWJggJoM7Pm+BRoECAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.13,634,1427760000"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="4351644"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2015 18:15:01 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t5HIF1XI030245 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 17 Jun 2015 18:15:01 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.178]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:15:01 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Extension Headers / Impact on Security Devices
Thread-Index: AQHQqSmGSeHjkF/67E+fZ39CppMgiw==
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 18:15:00 +0000
Message-ID: <251C17CD-BFA3-4A59-AC9B-16FB8426E961@cisco.com>
References: <20150515105406.GA3028@ernw.de> <87siav2m6p.fsf@stepladder-it.com> <F1D4404E5E6C614EB9D3083F4D15A7E7C4A92C@hex02> <D17F4C51.4ABB0%evyncke@cisco.com> <20150611165858.GT39827@ernw.de> <CAFU7BAR7m0sZsU9Rc=fUao32zaRE1=9XMBWjiL0AukehdpVpWQ@mail.gmail.com> <5580CC33.2080503@gmail.com> <8447882A-6B4B-4ABE-9BDF-5DA7AFE13AB1@cisco.com> <CAD6AjGSUPV_9EEQGCRHRpKe8Hejgx_CMPq6bEkCsK3v4qmgJgg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGSFEG1Gi_EDC+Qxd0bxx=rdFveRbVq20ODZE6B5rDwF_Q@mail.gmail.com> <5581B628.5030206@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5581B628.5030206@isi.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.123]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E1548B36-C1EF-4A01-9E6B-B28EEF065B6D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/1VsfjUamxnJ0XLp6srb6UW_Q6m4>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Extension Headers / Impact on Security Devices
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 18:15:03 -0000

> On Jun 17, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote:
> 
> IPv6 *is* the innovation, and because of that - for over 15 years -
> "you" (commercial vendors) told users how expensive it would be to
> implement and it wasn't ready (because "you" were making higher margins
> on IPv4 equipment).

I don't think that's a fair statement. I'd suggest that in discussing people's motivations, you discuss what you know. I could discuss the issues we have had with product line management, but not in ASCII. That's a topic for the bar.