Re: [v6ops] Revised Internet Drafts for allocation of IPv6 space for LISP EIDs

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 23 October 2013 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE36911E83EC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.94
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.94 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ltuJ+u50wc+f for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC29B11E834D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id at1so1702055iec.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=gpEnHoA24/B3tqLAFffFX5NQGEAAjSBIRyY5JPNNpjs=; b=KjrsdM0u/fb9CyzbR8a/mGOdP85yLpACs0GVcfSTvwiTh38rrfEgUkXaOzaFxxeHJJ jXIXdMOC5rqtBPMkMcithYhuP0GGwmlTm5/zYCmbSZk8Vg9S/6yZdGTUzARavT0sZfTz 6AXOqg2YDfp/AqBqKiIbdVYfGtdZ3iEJn+UXIeiHQGnQsmst8GBOFnkvME0s179ZBpce 4P2SLaBZRwtd7tNRNksHjn+5pBKl2HwjY+rvmdNPVlFb44algmxmF2qJCX6dVUANBpMQ oQsqVwVyhGrj/5teUFCuCt2fK9Q9cmxRVomTQoXPP2Ru1aVrEsQvcb3TCXcy8LwfaMNT 3TUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=gpEnHoA24/B3tqLAFffFX5NQGEAAjSBIRyY5JPNNpjs=; b=JIGa8q/0ef7kABVdx4PiHKvetYbA4sOL8V4AVLYhR34IWimr9wxN4ZfxSpLIu12m8P qJNkuO+BB3d+MK47grY3Nh9eI6mtpjtIgAbCzXA3unO5vlif5DkBhdmT4UM6DLy1++VG vnbE2OFqzNvGPud59QtOkJm1MDNf/2IiMvEwHs08oRly2CM2ze7mSFMSU0/Z5Th1GznE T41U4y5OCzMxMtepHus96GqQAtNM/wMTZxh7FFNEEywR5zz3H3lEyiZx3bCWwfXuyHUn saVxmLtlcIfyM17fgIBDMPqOwLDbowTo281Ep70boRZR8SqNINB2J5QE4UiK6zjJcX9O RLBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkm+s53k8LXOUUi2qkSWLjZD53/SuY12URDXByeLSKMILRfSWU1aG7ak0ous72B0DvrukprCentCll1UjsXbzpUGA582u6XQYTgw1mXUOqnO/qlCnefCzKNFSQ2NUl8fRxq4v7Hnm7u2l4aHEv1dDF/hakNjrNQVZBoDSwyqd30ahu/id/JZ/hBKHEl4RU1Q0V+2vqd
X-Received: by 10.50.66.163 with SMTP id g3mr1268058igt.20.1382544689242; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.86.106 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5267ED12.4090602@innovationslab.net>
References: <28CFF7E5-E98E-4D97-B7F4-3A18C255253C@gigix.net> <D62C71FC-306F-4F91-97E2-84D6F64A58A3@istaff.org> <5267E96B.1000802@innovationslab.net> <20131023152549.GN50205@Space.Net> <5267EB60.7080105@innovationslab.net> <CAKD1Yr1SpS0e3qDkZyRsiSB-a_oXCi7nWKe2szxW34mJfhJnxw@mail.gmail.com> <5267ED12.4090602@innovationslab.net>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 01:11:09 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0CixObNWW=CuZgXfF4WUXKK0u+8jw8DdF4M9n6s6ZRcQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdca31c16cb5f04e96ac505
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Revised Internet Drafts for allocation of IPv6 space for LISP EIDs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:11:33 -0000

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Brian Haberman
<brian@innovationslab.net>wrote;wrote:

> Keep in mind that the referenced draft went through IETF Last
> Call and was subsequently sent back to the WG due to the concerns
> raised about routing and potentially creating a parallel address registry
> outside of the RIRs.
>

Which it's still doing, right? The block-mgmnt draft is all about creating
a parallel address registry.