IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers - implications from new development for EHs

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 31 July 2020 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24893A0B53 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YZb45zEs9yW9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85AA63A0A55 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id t15so7903745pjq.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JtrjPct49JUf7V7QdyUMcfYpeIH5JQes0Ui2dXrtE/k=; b=jPdT5S+ju7eDV4EHvyu/Ne/VKAAkBOMswjv8b0J6G6e985Rv8KPEzilDiM9BCTaP1z TCTpxO1Hdh+dFdX0Im/tL37rM1yI7QIAzJN+F+zYqMraAZmg7sNpHjO5sovlASzt/LgK srP8IiwTzoNigRcAM8zSyazvrGqSQ1cvA1uaZuuQBiVc6vdV10GHtsJbAO9bM4LMrLAo FKr+qlxzZxYQQqzdMSkOG/+htBGq0QORHY9xl64908/60yRKaWgBjyRbWrm3RW+Cgja2 Ct/kCDsHWlmYNOxK3Zk6Jal+4OKeWz70QkrSPHhXwm4btnRz93nYOIM0yHUl2M0vppOU 5v0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JtrjPct49JUf7V7QdyUMcfYpeIH5JQes0Ui2dXrtE/k=; b=O1Bb7CfoUEJeocdsQxne2mdIgbNjO2AKZ4Wt3Pd1Y9tEuMJ2HiX5/pSiDsIfrrohxF pWsFz5lerLOBoBGcaxAnKabRwCCBdQJUOL++uvV+MrfBm8xqpyIb+qcwdnLEL+4D6HiF eQYGc9P7ZlaywSCRUOLHx2kI0jUSnEk4pI+NzOVtI2Df0JqrtMqDhj7an0nJCMpnsCsY itjao/KXh/Tvzrka5oVEu4QC8j1SQA4+MC6bxzdWJ6hOB5o3EV2e5v6Bk9AQwrHpWmIS CLOY7yuFgYzNysdWKVH4lfmDkMw0ZqN/vp4t8YJVpanyxSAoYVZAiDCcwZNqjZPtUVCW 5XmA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532W1z5Iu4LQe1Rvsgf8t3B/VxlmHMHrzxzFg1G19CCmdsVW0/Pr kfq0AnL4iYVDDGQo3mrsJZc83/0z7xM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQ1aEbOedwiZvkTG2FHBrXWwPrZLaBIelLKsQNyituTobm7kW47bSix/GfpjJTQLqGN0u1wA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6f:: with SMTP id 102mr3700118pla.163.1596204092600; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5800:652::199f? ([2600:8802:5800:652::199f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c9sm8983096pjr.35.2020.07.31.07.01.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4573db3f-ac8d-3103-1979-e803ae40f117@si6networks.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:01:31 -0700
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <28BE382F-E455-4B22-95FE-18924DF0FCFE@gmail.com>
References: <d8d59ce07f7f4031a545ff6e24fdbb88@huawei.com> <20200729084351.GG2485@Space.Net> <32BAEAEA-7352-4BAE-ADA8-FDA2395D5732@employees.org> <a6ed89a8-c12e-b8d2-c720-5cc02e127a68@si6networks.com> <FCBD1043-A0B2-435A-9AB9-0FCE3566C769@employees.org> <4573db3f-ac8d-3103-1979-e803ae40f117@si6networks.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, otroan@employees.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/1gOJUP2nzt0TZ8OxJiuVWwg58kU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers - implications from new development for EHs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:01:41 -0000

If I may make a minor suggestion...

If you're going to throw brickbats at each other, that seems to be more appropriate to private exchanges. 

In 6man, there is a discussion regarding draft-ietf-6man-mtu-option, which looks at the issue of extension headers, and - based on data - makes suggestions of how one might use them in a manner that is not filtered by the network. Their approach seems to not start from "let's deprecate everything" or "any opinion that disagrees with mine is idiocy". Frankly, I think there might be value in it.

> On Jul 29, 2020, at 3:50 AM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> 
> On 29/7/20 07:43, otroan@employees.org wrote:
>>>> Anyway I don't quite understand what this document adds to work describing ossification in general
>>> 
>>> Avoiding rehashing the same discussion everytime the issue of EHs comes up?
>> So you are proposing to fully embrace ossification and deprecate all EHs?
> 
> I'm proposing to document and acknowledge reality.
> 
> Are you proposing to continue in denial?
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email