IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] CPE Prefix Sub-Delegation on LAN

Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net> Sat, 01 January 2011 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8D53A68D3 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 08:41:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.274, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DSaSjUHVMm9h for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 08:41:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc1-s8.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s8.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.19]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E610E3A6914 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 08:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP22 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s8.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 1 Jan 2011 08:43:25 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [70.26.23.173]
X-Originating-Email: [tom111.taylor@bell.net]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP2275C1BB16678E1DE8530BD8050@phx.gbl>
Received: from [192.168.2.17] ([70.26.23.173]) by BLU0-SMTP22.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 1 Jan 2011 08:43:24 -0800
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:43:27 -0500
From: Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Guillaume.Leclanche@swisscom.com
References: <7E338A9A7F416C4AB2BA4D4E2DEBA0844F58EC451F@sg2019z.corproot.net> <A9704C3A-2D7C-432D-A74B-C4F26566CE0A@cisco.com> <7E338A9A7F416C4AB2BA4D4E2DEBA0844F58EC45CA@sg2019z.corproot.net>
In-Reply-To: <7E338A9A7F416C4AB2BA4D4E2DEBA0844F58EC45CA@sg2019z.corproot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jan 2011 16:43:24.0850 (UTC) FILETIME=[0217D120:01CBA9D3]
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] CPE Prefix Sub-Delegation on LAN
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 16:41:48 -0000

Sorry to be a little late on this. Just regarding your final point, RFC
5969 provides a DHCPv4 option for configuration of the 6rd CE, including
the prefix.

On 22/12/2010 1:27 PM, Guillaume.Leclanche@swisscom.com wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- From: Fred Baker
>> [mailto:fred@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 6:12 PM
>>
...
>
> There might be some work to do to say how the dhcpv6 server in the
> CPE should get the prefix received from the ISP, also when the ISP is
> not using DHCPv6. For example, with 6rd. However, since the 6rd
> parameters have to be pre-provisioned or given via DHCP(v4), I can
> imagine that there's a way to sort this out without too much pain.
>
> Guillaume _______________________________________________ v6ops
> mailing list v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status