IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 10 July 2012 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB61A11E8177 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.226
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.226 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.227, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c4tcoF8Li9FN for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3549611E816C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=4209; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1341935497; x=1343145097; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=q9zEWwohrsJgvKzW3gZFavHC2bBtdXRkxi8r6FRGylQ=; b=j4b5HExGB4F1bWGXhdjthLK0TYJClsQflJmogp3oaWS4B579iss1D68I hM5DWaNAMyRhfgYkLCblpaK77nEycl/ROAlV0Jnj97yiJoZNg3PTWIfJe bTJhLgzo4QYW4CqrXy5lPKDysGerRcQQ6Pm/1bBGxvV0BW2Cv07Zr0Ytc Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAEBP/E+tJXG+/2dsb2JhbABFt3mBB4IgAQEBAwEBAQELBAEnKwkLBQsCAQg2ECcLJQIEDgUUBgiHZQYLnFWgNASLQIVCYAOVNo4fgWaCXw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,559,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="100450915"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2012 15:51:37 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6AFpahB023864 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:51:36 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.118]) by xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:51:36 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda
Thread-Index: AQHNUnbpWFu7FKUfJEyvobkjy/vWXZcjFqiA
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:51:11 +0000
Message-ID: <45F1DB32-74F6-4E4A-88E2-118B76A5F474@cisco.com>
References: <8D73E1D6-A968-4397-A843-FE073197B7F1@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D73E1D6-A968-4397-A843-FE073197B7F1@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.114.240]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19030.006
x-tm-as-result: No--49.013300-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <829FCE7B18B7AB4EBCADD88C934AC8AB@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:51:25 -0000

I have an updated list, as of the -00 cutoff yesterday. I have culled out drafts that have not been updated since the last meeting.

The three "not clear" drafts seem to me on the hairy edge. In Fred's case, yes, there has been list discussion. It has mostly been to tell him he's wrong in his approach. What little discussion has happened on draft-lopez-v6ops-dc-ipv6 seems to mostly point to other documents as already saying things. draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf is just new, and hasn't been discussed.

Your thoughts on this?

#no expressed interest
Apr 26 20:07 draft-jiang-v6ops-v4v6mc-proxy-01.txt
Mar 29 11:27 draft-donley-v6ops-ce-router-design-00.txt

#out of charter
May  9 19:44 draft-templin-v6ops-isops-17.txt
Mar 30 19:33 draft-yang-v6ops-fast6-00.txt

#in IESG or RFC Editor queues
May 15 10:12 draft-kuarsingh-v6ops-6to4-provider-managed-tunnel-06.txt
May 22 05:30 draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-04.txt
Jul  3 02:45 draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-02.txt
May 29 19:10 draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline-incremental-ipv6-04.txt
Jun  9 13:41 draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-discard-prefix-05.txt
May 16 19:02 draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-09.txt

#WGLC requested in v6ops, no news from AD on sunset4
Jul  2 20:42 draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-05.txt (WGLC requested by authors)

#Not clear
Jun 19 19:33 draft-lopez-v6ops-dc-ipv6-02.txt
Jul  4 07:42 draft-generic-v6ops-tunmtu-09.txt
Jun 30 03:02 draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt

#For agenda
Jun 29 06:37 draft-matthews-v6ops-design-guidelines-00.txt
Jun 12 03:26 draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance-01.txt (WGLC requested by authors)
Apr 29 21:58 draft-gundavelli-v6ops-community-wifi-svcs-04.txt
Jul  4 02:18 draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02.txt

On Jun 24, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:

> I sat down this morning to assess our agenda. Interested in working group comment.
> 
> # no update
> Jan 11 16:48 draft-yang-v6ops-fast6-pppoe-02.txt
> Feb 21 18:10 draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-multihoming-without-ipv6nat-04.txt
> Feb 23 07:29 draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt
> Feb 25 11:37 draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-01.txt
> Feb 28 08:49 draft-chkpvc-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-00.txt
> Mar  5 17:46 draft-ma-v6ops-terminal-test-00.txt
> Mar  7 07:33 draft-carpenter-v6ops-label-balance-02.txt
> Mar 12 06:21 draft-vanrein-v6ops-6bed4-01.txt
> Mar 12 17:52 draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-01.txt
> Mar 12 21:34 draft-liu-v6ops-ula-usage-analysis-02.txt
> Mar 13 04:59 draft-sunq-v6ops-contents-transition-03.txt
> Mar 30 03:27 draft-donley-v6ops-ce-router-design-00.txt
> Mar 31 11:33 draft-yang-v6ops-fast6-00.txt
> 
> #no expressed interest
> Jun 20 11:33 draft-lopez-v6ops-dc-ipv6-02.txt
> Apr 27 12:07 draft-jiang-v6ops-v4v6mc-proxy-01.txt
> 
> #out of charter
> Jun 24 07:59 draft-generic-v6ops-tunmtu-07.txt
> May 10 11:44 draft-templin-v6ops-isops-17.txt
> 
> #in IESG queue
> May 30 11:10 draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline-incremental-ipv6-04.txt
> May 17 11:02 draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-09.txt
> 
> 
> #WGLC in v6ops or move to sunset4; awaiting AD direction
> May  8 10:14 draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-03.txt
> 
> #potential for agenda
> Apr 30 13:58 draft-gundavelli-v6ops-community-wifi-svcs-04.txt
> May 16 02:12 draft-kuarsingh-v6ops-6to4-provider-managed-tunnel-06.txt
> May 22 21:30 draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-04.txt
> 
> #for agenda, perhaps ready for last call
> Jun 12 19:26 draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance-01.txt
> 
> 
> 
> For draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address, the last discussion was in April, and we were to expect an update. If that happens, I expect to bring that to the agenda. 
> 
> Lee asked about draft-chkpvc-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 on the list, but I see no update and I wasn't clear on the list commentary, whether the operators want to discuss. 
> 
> There is still, of course, time for folks to post -00 drafts (until 9 July); if there is list discussion of those drafts, we will include them in the agenda.
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email