Re: [v6ops] Comment on draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices-09
Philip Matthews <philip_matthews@magma.ca> Mon, 02 November 2015 10:53 UTC
Return-Path: <philip_matthews@magma.ca>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA871A1EF3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:53:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.565
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GD2ENjDXZccH for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:53:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tor-smtp-04.primus.ca (smtp-auth-16.primus.ca [67.230.159.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493C21A1EB7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:53:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from i223-218-131-39.s41.a014.ap.plala.or.jp ([223.218.131.39] helo=[192.168.2.100]) by tor-smtp-04.primus.ca with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <philip_matthews@magma.ca>) id 1ZtCjo-0001SA-C9; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 05:53:20 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-1-2932741"
From: Philip Matthews <philip_matthews@magma.ca>
In-Reply-To: <563734D2.2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 19:52:47 +0900
Message-Id: <01D87BBE-112A-4F40-9F1B-2272B2471457@magma.ca>
References: <563734D2.2@gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
X-Authenticated: philip_matthews - i223-218-131-39.s41.a014.ap.plala.or.jp ([192.168.2.100]) [223.218.131.39]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/27NXH3sa47nSotd3P3-lHdz-SFM>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Comment on draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices-09
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:53:22 -0000
Can you explain a bit more what you mean by that? - Philip On 2015-11-02, at 19:02 , Alexandre Petrescu wrote: > Hello, > > With respect to the design-choices draft, I think it is worth to mention in the discussion that backwards compatibility is a 'pro' when considering PA/PI/ULA schemes for enterprise networks. It is not a drawback. > > This (maintain IPv4 ok while migrating) is the most important requirement in the networks I work. > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
- [v6ops] Comment on draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choice… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] Comment on draft-ietf-v6ops-design-ch… Philip Matthews
- Re: [v6ops] Comment on draft-ietf-v6ops-design-ch… joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Comment on draft-ietf-v6ops-design-ch… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Comment on draft-ietf-v6ops-design-ch… Philip Matthews
- Re: [v6ops] Comment on draft-ietf-v6ops-design-ch… Brian E Carpenter