[v6ops] I-D Action: draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-exclusive-bit.txt

"Mudric, Dusan (Dusan)" <dmudric@avaya.com> Fri, 20 October 2017 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <dmudric@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4887D1332D7; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f1PJ_acyaSHw; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 735D8132125; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2HbAABf/+lZ/wUHmMZcGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgm8iTmRuJweDc4ofjz+YMYIRChMShRYCGoQfPxgBAgEBAQEBAQEDaCiCakZYAQEBAQEBIwI+RREKXgEVFRYBCQIEJAwmAQQBEQEIGokaZAEPnyGKaoInIQKKfQEBAQcBAQEBAR4Fgy6CB4FRihmDEi+CMgWYb4hwAodhmQ+HHpV6gTkfOUKBGXoVgy6EXnYBAQGJTAGBEAEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: A2HbAABf/+lZ/wUHmMZcGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgm8iTmRuJweDc4ofjz+YMYIRChMShRYCGoQfPxgBAgEBAQEBAQEDaCiCakZYAQEBAQEBIwI+RREKXgEVFRYBCQIEJAwmAQQBEQEIGokaZAEPnyGKaoInIQKKfQEBAQcBAQEBAR4Fgy6CB4FRihmDEi+CMgWYb4hwAodhmQ+HHpV6gTkfOUKBGXoVgy6EXnYBAQGJTAGBEAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,405,1503374400"; d="scan'208,217";a="257308754"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2017 09:56:59 -0400
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-US1EXHC01.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.85.12]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Oct 2017 09:56:59 -0400
Received: from AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com ([fe80::a5d3:ad50:5be9:1922]) by AZ-US1EXHC01.global.avaya.com ([135.11.85.12]) with mapi id 14.03.0352.000; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 09:56:58 -0400
From: "Mudric, Dusan (Dusan)" <dmudric@avaya.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-exclusive-bit.txt
Thread-Index: AdNJqtdb6Pz+HqMKTw+B+rXAtOZBjQ==
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:56:57 +0000
Message-ID: <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E4585AE25F8@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 10.0.250.9
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [135.11.85.50]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E4585AE25F8AZUS1EXMB03glob_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/2IS3EEmKdLZDOfFRNaNXJ7Rp_oo>
Subject: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-exclusive-bit.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:57:02 -0000

Hi,

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-exclusive-bit-02#section-5.2.2.2
It is free to assign any address formed
   from an exclusive prefix to any available interface

Is it? What if a host has two interfaces connected to two ISPs that assign exclusive prefixes? Each interface would end up with two ‘exclusive’ prefixes. Can they be still called ‘exclusive’?

Regards,
Dusan.