Re: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda

[t.petch <[e-mail]>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Masanobu Kawashima" <[e-mail]>
To: "t.petch" <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>; "Fred Baker (fred)" <[e-mail]>; "Ron Bonica"
<[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 3:55 PM
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Thank you for your comment.
>
> We took your opinion into consideration.
> I think that we did everything we could.
> Could you please comment us your unclear points or suggestion?
> If we should revise the document, we will revise it immediately.

Ah, I haven't read -04 yet:-(

There was a quite a lot of comment on -03 so I was expecting a -04 and
confirmation or otherwise, on the list, that the comments had been
addressed.  Then I saw Fred's note about -03, which I still don't
understand but I realise I have no idea what sunset4 is, which may be
part of the part of the problem but thought that WGLC was premature
until a new version appeared so I drafted a note in response to Fred.

As I was about to hit send, I saw -04 had appeared but still thought
WGLC premature and sent the note anyway.

So I will read -04 and hope that everyone else who had comments will do
likewise, after which, I hope that the chairs will initiate WGLC.

Tom Petch

> Regards,
> Masanobu
>
>
> >I am confused about the legend for
> >draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-03.txt
> >
> >There was a lively discussion in May which left a number of issues
> >unclear for me, and I see that, today, a new version has arrived, so
I
> >think that further discussion should ensue, preferrably on the list.
> >
> >Tom Petch
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <[e-mail]>
> >To: <[e-mail]>
> >Cc: "Ron Bonica" <[e-mail]>
> >Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 3:04 AM
> >Subject: [v6ops] Prep for v6ops IETF 84 agenda
> >
> >
> >> I sat down this morning to assess our agenda. Interested in working
> >group comment.
> >>
> >> # no update
> >> Jan 11 16:48 draft-yang-v6ops-fast6-pppoe-02.txt
> >> Feb 21 18:10
draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-multihoming-without-ipv6nat-04.txt
> >> Feb 23 07:29 draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-03.txt
> >> Feb 25 11:37 draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-01.txt
> >> Feb 28 08:49 draft-chkpvc-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-00.txt
> >> Mar  5 17:46 draft-ma-v6ops-terminal-test-00.txt
> >> Mar  7 07:33 draft-carpenter-v6ops-label-balance-02.txt
> >> Mar 12 06:21 draft-vanrein-v6ops-6bed4-01.txt
> >> Mar 12 17:52 draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-01.txt
> >> Mar 12 21:34 draft-liu-v6ops-ula-usage-analysis-02.txt
> >> Mar 13 04:59 draft-sunq-v6ops-contents-transition-03.txt
> >> Mar 30 03:27 draft-donley-v6ops-ce-router-design-00.txt
> >> Mar 31 11:33 draft-yang-v6ops-fast6-00.txt
> >>
> >> #no expressed interest
> >> Jun 20 11:33 draft-lopez-v6ops-dc-ipv6-02.txt
> >> Apr 27 12:07 draft-jiang-v6ops-v4v6mc-proxy-01.txt
> >>
> >> #out of charter
> >> Jun 24 07:59 draft-generic-v6ops-tunmtu-07.txt
> >> May 10 11:44 draft-templin-v6ops-isops-17.txt
> >>
> >> #in IESG queue
> >> May 30 11:10 draft-ietf-v6ops-wireline-incremental-ipv6-04.txt
> >> May 17 11:02 draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-09.txt
> >>
> >>
> >> #WGLC in v6ops or move to sunset4; awaiting AD direction
> >> May  8 10:14 draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-03.txt
> >>
> >> #potential for agenda
> >> Apr 30 13:58 draft-gundavelli-v6ops-community-wifi-svcs-04.txt
> >> May 16 02:12
draft-kuarsingh-v6ops-6to4-provider-managed-tunnel-06.txt
> >> May 22 21:30 draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-04.txt
> >>
> >> #for agenda, perhaps ready for last call
> >> Jun 12 19:26 draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance-01.txt
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> For draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address, the last discussion was in
> >April, and we were to expect an update. If that happens, I expect to
> >bring that to the agenda.
> >>
> >> Lee asked about draft-chkpvc-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 on the
list,
> >but I see no update and I wasn't clear on the list commentary,
whether
> >the operators want to discuss.
> >>
> >> There is still, of course, time for folks to post -00 drafts (until
9
> >July); if there is list discussion of those drafts, we will include
them
> >in the agenda.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> v6ops mailing list
> >> [e-mail]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> >>
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >v6ops mailing list
> >[e-mail]
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>
> ========================================
>  NEC AccessTechnica, Ltd.
>  Product Development Department
>  Masanobu Kawashima
>  [e-mail]
>  http://www.necat.co.jp/
> ========================================
>
>