Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - 64share

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 29 June 2015 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CDA1A9112 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 06:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gMcYqSYl1pDt for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 06:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA55F1A9127 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 06:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id t5TDG9Bo013145; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:16:09 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A6EA202D26; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:19:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04885202E20; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:19:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id t5TDG7m3009453; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:16:09 +0200
To: holger.metschulat@telekom.de, v6ops@ietf.org
References: <E1C235B5-1421-4DAF-A2F3-F963982233DF@apple.com> <5587EFDD.6030807@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506221415100.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAAedzxo7Cqxwrp_zViDhOhWc+dtcy9M9=a-FjW7M8APNx7VUQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTscUeDL6zC62tHL300M9QCD4_CHZUErQYejMUJVVetzw@mail.gmail.com> <558AA4F1.8080503@gmail.com> <88CAA5385EB5404392BF93106C8C53F89620073E87@HE111507.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <55914517.4050602@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:16:07 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <88CAA5385EB5404392BF93106C8C53F89620073E87@HE111507.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/2dTcrYdqDUzRkp9SZ1eH27bHRi8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - 64share
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:16:28 -0000


Le 29/06/2015 14:51, holger.metschulat@telekom.de a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>> Android is a linux based os, I dont see why it wouldnt support
>> dhcp-pd?
>
>> My linux based non-Android machines do dhcp-pd ok.
>
> Have you tried to run DHCP-PD via IPv6-capable USB dongles? The ones
>  that I know of don't forward DHCPv6 requests to the network. So even
>  if your OS supports it, it's most likely that you modem (or its
> chipset) does not support it.

Do you mean USB-Ethernet dongles?  No, I have not tried DHCPv6-PD on
USB-Ethernet dongles.

The modem and chipsets on LTE that I have tried do forward DHCPv6
requests.  For example it transmits the DHCPv6 Request and then receives
an DHCPv6 Ack from the cellular network containing an IPv6 address.  But
if I make a DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation request then that is not answered.

I guess that hardware which blocks DHCPv6-PD also blocks DHCPv6.
Otherwise it would be an intentional blocking of DHCPv6-PD...

Alex

>