Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Le 01/11/2019 à 14:51, Ole Troan a écrit :
> Hi Ted,
> 
>>> At the risk of straying off topic. There is no mechanism for permissionless networking in IPv6.
>>> (which I think is a big gap)
>>
>> Do you mean permissionless advertising of routes to new networks?   If so, I agree.   It can be made to sort of work for limited cases, but there’s no standardized way to make end-to-end connectivity work between all networks using the various bits of protocol and practice that we have at present.
> 
> I would define it as:
> "Permission-less extensions of the network with new links (and by implications new routers) are not supported."

This is a problem statement.  It must be put in a draft.

There is a related problem statement about the IID being 64bit length, 
and the SLAAC on Ethernet running only on that.

They could be associated.

Alex

> 
> NPT66/NAT66 is the only alternative (talking network layer here).
> 
> If we have permission then:
>   - normal managed network. Just add new router and run routing protocol. Manually managed addressing
>   - HNCP (automated addressing and routing)
>   - hierarchical DHCP PD (only works in single rooted DAG)
>   - proxy ND (RFC recommending against)
> 
> Cheers,
> Ole
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>