[v6ops] Re: 464XLAT-only networks

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Fri, 25 October 2024 22:55 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1451C15108F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.608
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.608 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GmZAXjQ-_wJc for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FFAAC14CF0D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-71e467c3996so1908564b3a.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1729896915; x=1730501715; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hfOCWP5gFpTpy9S9wTL3adp1ObDfbdH/rnzxv9iMFNM=; b=IrpTMKnt3RkKQNs6eDw4X9awAuvZQ5J8N6POiuXQVmLsdCqgKCjn3Jpnjxh00USMyO re5nMIZ5+qN5YiHyVUd0TDwHAks8Q2fpfNR0XBYryTBzQmS8dDWmKtqKTTIVZEpeAWqJ P9YbFrgPrybaw2ILIAuOL9aKu30JufpbEaw349tG5L1297pwTF8gPlnxTH6IWLEiXf/j Pgfk7GPoKYBeKrJ/h8q32rAKsOvWDHM7FGX++25Pk83HzzGEF3IS/QZOffesPjiQhIRS Mwb25UVtxTPY/ySeU162byvRFHps9zTvQ3KRDkBrnNwdochZ2MYZF7I2bR8fb8U0mcMH ECqQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729896915; x=1730501715; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=hfOCWP5gFpTpy9S9wTL3adp1ObDfbdH/rnzxv9iMFNM=; b=hUtzdQWKNp0xGHs371kLLnGL0tUAGs+Q8OuzLqgALbbjWjGqHyiButAh2dhWIa5x6q gYlKbl6rbn59lgVz+hz+gCxIEXL/SzjogzbQfzhyiCuKFdV7KmyVFz0GZxMZY3eE/vxN iKzgOLhVa4XmBWBBwMci/WL7x+nM2y2dSyX5PPgUxdIw4NF0ib4Q3miz6O2APiLufkQF GBWGD5mjRU3BZHL1tyiA/U21x86PuynOjLmdfIwp+PJNhtNHabWmGsAERBAsvg8NSaG7 mS+7oRFYRyEV1kmvCNrmXiHOez4cWmBiKQT2jY9vhYUF4ohK5IlrFnkqJcLCq8bSQd2T IJgw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWm8+B4gGxGFjPP8F4kGsjWPiO/WG9jv6C6dhZHElxNdEk6IcKpSVq+eZ2y3QTuTO4XUdg4LA==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzSR0OELoXp4jxIhNbYU76b3oVNzNoQBUWNMxXWLaXFJMYijX82 deUX5mvfhBpgk+UnQScVvlfdntx9OL9ySaNRJ46D5wFBc9k9x4iov1RfDJVvszl92VM8fKeHO9i P0PxoiWTf5/c9dHQlAWylCsUV4ou5WlCDw7WUKeFlzJXucGwSbw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGTzJxzTmF0YCvdYq6FuXJl2zcJ3A4ouksWnlQsDRkoHwr4IwR8Q5dlLSfpb0nX9R5xBRHyD16dEXF0FGdwFYo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:b96:b0:71e:688c:1edd with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7206305a08cmr1478594b3a.27.1729896914595; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+-cKyPQR8k=PnG+X+Sj1XXwHmioUQQej3Wmx7jzMGFc=NtXLA@mail.gmail.com> <ZxowSz2G_eY3Mkt5@Space.Net> <CA+-cKyMJwLd+EVMNCt7m=-7pt4Tfr5g5aFUxQa5m02c+VSB04w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3MxB_+MOMXtyZ+kK9S_-cNRP=v+8iQYEJN8VBNY6uayg@mail.gmail.com> <2ed2ca78-da5c-42c6-ba20-9e8cee2d1df0@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2ed2ca78-da5c-42c6-ba20-9e8cee2d1df0@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 07:54:59 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3vV9db80S5t5hUnPsqSWTWvxptFWA720UstgxiByxx-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Soni \"It/Its\" L." <fakedme+ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000018678506255503f2"
Message-ID-Hash: M7PXFDEUYDBB2JILBYL4KHP6U2DZLCI4
X-Message-ID-Hash: M7PXFDEUYDBB2JILBYL4KHP6U2DZLCI4
X-MailFrom: lorenzo@google.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: 464XLAT-only networks
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/3bEhPiMB-nlzs46iklw5WN3LR_M>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>

Yes, but IPv6 *can* provide global end-to-end connectivity, because users
can (and usually do) get public addresses. IPv4 can't.

On Fri, 25 Oct 2024, 20:02 Soni "It/Its" L., <fakedme+ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> that's false, ipv6 is not any more globally reachable than ipv4.
>
> it's called a firewall.
>
> on the other hand, our friends seem most intimidated by the ipv6 addresses
> themselves. 464XLAT-only maps what they're familiar with (ipv4) into what
> they're unfamiliar with (ipv6), breaking that barrier.
>
> once you break that barrier, the routing concepts themselves are basically
> the same.
>
> On 2024-10-25 07:57, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
>
> But such a network won't teach students how IPv6 works or what it's good
> at (global reachability). Why not just use IPv4? It's an IPv4-only network
> after all ..
>
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2024, 21:15 Soni L., <fakedme+ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> some providers still don't do ipv6, maybe you still want to migrate your
>> internal network to ipv6 to get it ready for future provider upgrades.
>>
>> or maybe you want to develop an ipv6-only consumer/SOHO router that works
>> on ipv4-only ISPs.
>>
>> or maybe you want to deploy a rogue ipv6-only network on an otherwise
>> ipv4-only organization, to prove a point.
>>
>> there are a few hypothetical use-cases.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024, 08:32 Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 07:32:45AM -0300, Soni L. wrote:
>>> > we would like to propose a bastardization of IPv6-only networks and
>>> > 464XLAT: the 464XLAT-only network.
>>> >
>>> > it's a network that doesn't provide access to the IPv6 internet, but
>>> does
>>> > provide access to the IPv4 internet via 464XLAT.
>>> >
>>> > thoughts?
>>>
>>> "why"?
>>>
>>> (As in "why bother with an IPv6 based transition technology when you
>>> do not have outside IPv6, which is ways easier to get done than to
>>> move existing internal networks to v6-only")
>>>
>>> Gert Doering
>>>         -- NetMaster
>>> --
>>> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>>>
>>> SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo
>>> Lalla,
>>>                                            Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler
>>> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14
>>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen+14?entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>       Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
>>> D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
>>> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list -- v6ops@ietf.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to v6ops-leave@ietf.org
>>
>
> --
> plural system (tend to say 'we'), it/she/they, it instead of you
>
>