Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> Mon, 17 July 2017 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7E0131BBA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.32
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.32 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jisc.ac.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z8l9DTnUm60v for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com [146.101.78.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4093E129482 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jisc.ac.uk; s=mimecast20170213; t=1500300885; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=GmjEfRz0tEgnwVPX7d5jsRVgNnLSBhOtSys2TgPhOcs=; b=VGJ90POF3iId9Cd2ngnkJL4QGz/lcM6b/CH4GciXfuGtvzhCF3fwVo0dU11CshWcCsuemZ+DIqK/MQqaBEJ5jL8DhfV5YPxAanktUYtPpU8P8qRP0GN656WE2AhKSGkDF+PpIRKmGZIhcLHvYx/vDxnmau/27osE8lntWYbwLlw=
Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-ve1eur01lp0241.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.241]) (Using TLS) by eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-75-KiQ2alElNryKFFEJ0_3cDQ-1; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:14:41 +0100
Received: from AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.163.188.14) by AM3PR07MB0517.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.141.47.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1282.4; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:14:39 +0000
Received: from AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8a2:fb24:484f:ba3]) by AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8a2:fb24:484f:ba3%13]) with mapi id 15.01.1282.008; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:14:39 +0000
From: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
To: Noah <noah@neo.co.tz>
CC: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
Thread-Index: AQHS/r05SwldI9zBi0erX+YxO1XvLqJXsGYAgAAAgQCAAEXNAIAAGd0A
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:14:39 +0000
Message-ID: <3283B1C1-1D6C-462E-82E0-4E9BDB63DF16@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <7643C1DC-76A3-4652-9BB1-D0D42801F37E@consulintel.es> <CAFU7BASvuj+JrsSZzUKauBsph4hdr+ZdVjkg0_Q+00Spm5PJoQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=Rc6mF7vPmk6=5Xf+KYJUFsNfFQvZRkL6VGOff701BQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAEqgTWZvS59Mkb4_A0OLR0n7xnS9zvg4_-u5cNRz8OWc3nrmCg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEqgTWZvS59Mkb4_A0OLR0n7xnS9zvg4_-u5cNRz8OWc3nrmCg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
x-originating-ip: [2001:67c:370:1998:5c70:fa95:912:6170]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM3PR07MB0517; 20:FsJyQ0gnjYjZuGaZB8GrjHuN+pbnfAnJyS+CALI2Z7gGY2pbCGpY5kCglaXWLk+A/328NYtftSuc7MJTyEVqehLHIHjDZebxAEc8JnCfZSTzpLt4ESTbpIj0XwaLA5FHXHPXbegphLcZctAGyIrjmauklIIIkVifADoMkyKbsuo=
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1221c5ea-1ae4-437b-1ac9-08d4cd1e29a1
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(22001)(300000502095)(300135100095)(2017030254075)(300000503095)(300135400095)(2017052603031)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095); SRVR:AM3PR07MB0517;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM3PR07MB0517:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(133145235818549)(236129657087228)(48057245064654)(100405760836317);
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM3PR07MB0517AA636CB38338FC1AEB0AD6A00@AM3PR07MB0517.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(2017060910075)(8121501046)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(100000703101)(100105400095)(10201501046)(6041248)(20161123558100)(201703131423075)(201702281529075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(6072148)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:AM3PR07MB0517; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:AM3PR07MB0517;
x-forefront-prvs: 0371762FE7
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39410400002)(39840400002)(39450400003)(39400400002)(24454002)(377454003)(50986999)(6506006)(57306001)(6436002)(33656002)(82746002)(14454004)(6486002)(5660300001)(229853002)(81166006)(53546010)(74482002)(76176999)(6916009)(72206003)(2950100002)(39060400002)(36756003)(8676002)(478600001)(6116002)(38730400002)(5250100002)(6246003)(2906002)(110136004)(3660700001)(3280700002)(25786009)(50226002)(2900100001)(42882006)(8936002)(189998001)(4326008)(102836003)(53936002)(6512007)(54906002)(99286003)(93886004)(305945005)(7736002)(83716003)(86362001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AM3PR07MB0517; H:AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-ID: <F949D649C6FF574A9286396D9C84C990@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jisc.ac.uk
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Jul 2017 14:14:39.5969 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 48f9394d-8a14-4d27-82a6-f35f12361205
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM3PR07MB0517
X-MC-Unique: KiQ2alElNryKFFEJ0_3cDQ-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/3nbv-LU0DQLgPbaF9S-vgQEp6Wk>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:14:49 -0000

> On 17 Jul 2017, at 13:42, Noah <noah@neo.co.tz> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually if the fallback dual-stack network requires an explicit
> configuration on the client side (as the draft recommends) to avoid
> users connecting to it accidentally, the number of clients falling
> back to the dual stack SSID is very good data point to demonstrate
> what % of users are experiencing issues.
> 
> I couldnt agree more... Lets walk the talk folks.
> 
> So do we have consensus for the experiment to go on now that its pretty much logical for folks across the board that this is good stuff?

Sounds good to me. I’ve never had a problem with the IETF NAT64 network. I’d challenge those who have concerns to try it.  It’s not like there’s no fallback in place.

It’s also interesting - but I’d not make it the default - to try the IETF v6only SSID to gauge the v6 support for the tools you use on a regular basis, in your home or other 3rd party networks/services.  

Tim