[v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 smartphones (vs. IPv4) (was: BCP 202, RFC 7772 on Reducing Energy Consumption of Router Advertisements)
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 01 June 2016 12:40 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6586F12D1BF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7x_2Pl5nhxgW for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 190D912D1B8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id u51CeJQS003732; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:40:19 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B13A203664; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:40:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2692031C3; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:40:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id u51CeJs7026993; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:40:19 +0200
References: <20160211191203.4120F180472@rfc-editor.org>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5099e169-696d-54ec-a4a7-8cc773e358c5@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 14:40:19 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160211191203.4120F180472@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/42MVZYPwzLV4xiDs8rpW54FOyog>
Subject: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 smartphones (vs. IPv4) (was: BCP 202, RFC 7772 on Reducing Energy Consumption of Router Advertisements)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:40:30 -0000
Hi v6ops, I wonder whether there may be interest in evaluating the energy consumption of an IPv6 application on smartphones, compared to its IPv4 counterpart. I suspect the difference may be negligible but I am not sure. It would be good to avoid a situation in which the end user prefers IPv4 on the smartphone because IPv6 empties the battery. Alex Le 11/02/2016 à 20:12, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org a écrit : > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > BCP 202 > RFC 7772 > > Title: Reducing Energy Consumption of Router > Advertisements > Author: A. Yourtchenko, > L. Colitti > Status: Best Current Practice > Stream: IETF > Date: February 2016 > Mailbox: ayourtch@cisco.com, > lorenzo@google.com > Pages: 6 > Characters: 12555 > See Also: BCP 202 > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-03.txt > > URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7772 > > DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7772 > > Frequent Router Advertisement messages can severely impact host power > consumption. This document recommends operational practices to avoid > such impact. > > This document is a product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF. > > > BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the > Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for > improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. > > > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC > >
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Alexandre Petrescu
- [v6ops] BCP 202, RFC 7772 on Reducing Energy Cons… rfc-editor
- [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 sm… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Adeel Sadiq
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Nabil Benamar
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Nabil Benamar
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Heatley, Nick
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… otroan