[v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 smartphones (vs. IPv4) (was: BCP 202, RFC 7772 on Reducing Energy Consumption of Router Advertisements)

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 01 June 2016 12:40 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6586F12D1BF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7x_2Pl5nhxgW for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 190D912D1B8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id u51CeJQS003732; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:40:19 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B13A203664; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:40:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2692031C3; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:40:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id u51CeJs7026993; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:40:19 +0200
References: <20160211191203.4120F180472@rfc-editor.org>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5099e169-696d-54ec-a4a7-8cc773e358c5@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 14:40:19 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160211191203.4120F180472@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/42MVZYPwzLV4xiDs8rpW54FOyog>
Subject: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 smartphones (vs. IPv4) (was: BCP 202, RFC 7772 on Reducing Energy Consumption of Router Advertisements)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:40:30 -0000

Hi v6ops,

I wonder whether there may be interest in evaluating the energy 
consumption of an IPv6 application on smartphones, compared to its IPv4 
counterpart.

I suspect the difference may be negligible but I am not sure.

It would be good to avoid a situation in which the end user prefers IPv4 
on the smartphone because IPv6 empties the battery.

Alex

Le 11/02/2016 à 20:12, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org a écrit :
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>
>         BCP 202
>         RFC 7772
>
>         Title:      Reducing Energy Consumption of Router
>                     Advertisements
>         Author:     A. Yourtchenko,
>                     L. Colitti
>         Status:     Best Current Practice
>         Stream:     IETF
>         Date:       February 2016
>         Mailbox:    ayourtch@cisco.com,
>                     lorenzo@google.com
>         Pages:      6
>         Characters: 12555
>         See Also:   BCP 202
>
>         I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-03.txt
>
>         URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7772
>
>         DOI:        http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7772
>
> Frequent Router Advertisement messages can severely impact host power
> consumption.  This document recommends operational practices to avoid
> such impact.
>
> This document is a product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF.
>
>
> BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
> Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
> improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
>
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>   https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
>
> For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
> For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
>
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
>
>
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC
>
>