IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Sat, 02 July 2011 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E0E11E80AC; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 09:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.126
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.126 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.127, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l+HvRaWHUaWu; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 09:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og107.obsmtp.com (exprod7og107.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E2C11E808C; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 09:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob107.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTg9Jgiw+T/SvYqTY0/hYPSXulrBMqvql@postini.com; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:38:26 PDT
Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 09:36:07 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 12:36:06 -0400
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 12:36:05 -0400
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
Thread-Index: Acw41iMv6/qWspvgTzCQB463JqIp+A==
Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D3F3507EDA@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:38:27 -0000

Folks,

Whereas there has been considerable controversy regarding draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic, the v6ops chairs and document author have agreed to the following course of action:

- the V6OPS WG will withdraw its request to publish draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
- The author will introduce a new draft, intended for standards track publication. The new draft will update RFCs 3056 and 3068. It will say that if 6-to-4 is implemented, it must be turned off by default. 
- In order for the new draft to be published, it must achieve both V6OPS WG and IETF consensus

If anyone objects to this course of action, please speak up soon.

                                                    Ron
                                                    <Speaking as OPS Area AD>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status