IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Tue, 31 January 2017 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E2A129590 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:46:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.058
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.058 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aGmUy24z5Y0y for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:46:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0093.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7268012959F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:46:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=d8NFEHhwsz6qRh+nXsG6kWl6bMLbQWg/Uob7P8E1b9w=; b=UupW/bdtwfbioABJiKYm1i1oPVjRErUGygaholorm/JyMFPBH7WzJTCLXHbYHZ/pzqLHO/c/mKgOec9eVgedfZN7nwJE2pqz1SxJSj+tUQh3kdwFWXQLxmZwpcS7SC/9/Qy8nWhKYXxN3t15UkBkTpcnhahTMgn2kgGjiJ3zMWo=
Received: from BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.164.23.21) by BLUPR0501MB2049.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.164.23.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.874.6; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:46:33 +0000
Received: from BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.23.21]) by BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.23.21]) with mapi id 15.01.0874.020; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:46:33 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations
Thread-Index: AdJ71bub1L6aUKYaSxmQB+Og32Va4wAIitmAAALHifA=
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:46:33 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR0501MB2051AC8DCD40B0F7425C680BAE4A0@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BLUPR0501MB20515AFB8ECBEB3A930E9B0DAE4A0@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <b1bed263-2ac7-71c8-e9e5-ff5a3b9c4500@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b1bed263-2ac7-71c8-e9e5-ff5a3b9c4500@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rbonica@juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d935529e-5946-4da9-e616-08d44a1a3e11
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(48565401078); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2049;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR0501MB2049; 7: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
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR0501MB204955A4F5319FCC0E4A726BAE4A0@BLUPR0501MB2049.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(138986009662008)(100405760836317);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(6072148); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2049; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2049;
x-forefront-prvs: 0204F0BDE2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(39850400002)(39450400003)(39860400002)(39410400002)(39840400002)(377454003)(51444003)(24454002)(13464003)(199003)(189002)(86362001)(7736002)(53936002)(68736007)(92566002)(230783001)(305945005)(8676002)(575784001)(9686003)(74316002)(81156014)(6306002)(55016002)(99286003)(8936002)(81166006)(3280700002)(76176999)(25786008)(6436002)(2950100002)(38730400001)(5660300001)(39060400001)(66066001)(7696004)(6506006)(54356999)(229853002)(189998001)(107886002)(5001770100001)(2906002)(2900100001)(3846002)(106356001)(101416001)(33656002)(97736004)(122556002)(105586002)(3660700001)(77096006)(6116002)(102836003)(50986999); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2049; H:BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 Jan 2017 20:46:33.6110 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0501MB2049
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/4BQ098553Usev5dafQ7ZD16RSek>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:46:36 -0000

Ack. ULA-only is OK when disconnected from the Internet.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 2:26 PM
> To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>; IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations
> 
> Ron,
> 
> Thanks. But one nit surely:
> 
> > - Recommend against ULA-only
> 
> means
> 
> - Recommend against ULA-only (except when disconnected from the
> Internet)
> 
> Regards
>    Brian
> 
> On 01/02/2017 04:22, Ron Bonica wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Some time ago, I queried the WG's disposition regarding draft-ietf-v6ops-
> ula-usage-considerations
> (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=v6ops&index=x6OmZJ
> 1n2F0rBX6iq5GHRBHWRO0&gbt=1). I think that the consensus was:
> >
> > - Continue as informational
> > - Recommend against ULA-only
> > - Attempt to find some set of recommendations upon which the WG can
> agree.
> >
> > So, if the authors are so disposed, I encourage them to produce a new
> version of the draft, leveraging what we learned during this email thread.
> >
> >                                                            Ron
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > v6ops mailing list
> > v6ops@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email