Re: [v6ops] Revised Internet Drafts for allocation of IPv6 space for LISP EIDs

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 23 October 2013 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F16C11E83C7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.166
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.166 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.433, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7jNmeGPPrXoA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E9811E83F0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD0A60889 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:25:50 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5213607E7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:25:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 14207 invoked by uid 1007); 23 Oct 2013 17:25:49 +0200
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:25:49 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <20131023152549.GN50205@Space.Net>
References: <28CFF7E5-E98E-4D97-B7F4-3A18C255253C@gigix.net> <D62C71FC-306F-4F91-97E2-84D6F64A58A3@istaff.org> <5267E96B.1000802@innovationslab.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jHP/eq8oeUshSv2p"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5267E96B.1000802@innovationslab.net>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Revised Internet Drafts for allocation of IPv6 space for LISP EIDs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:25:54 -0000

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:21:15AM -0400, Brian Haberman wrote:
> >     space and define the associated allocation framework.  Assignments
> >     from this block may appear the in the BGP routing infrastructure.
> 
> With no hat on... I don't think there is any "may" about their
> appearance in BGP route tables.

So is this "will" or "MUST NOT"?

I haven't read the IDs yet, but would be wary about any "we're not happy
with the way the RIRs hand out addresses, so we build our own system
in parallel to it, and to hell with global routing" drafts.

If that's just "we use this inside LISP, and RIR space will used on
the outside", these addresses SHOULD NOT appear in global BGP.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279