Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4890 (3985)

Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com> Mon, 19 May 2014 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3B51A0152 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 May 2014 07:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_26=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5y3kEFRdmz7D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 May 2014 07:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from auth.a.painless.aa.net.uk (a.painless.aa.net.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:0:30::51bb:1e33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BBC81A010F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 May 2014 07:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mightyatom.folly.org.uk ([81.187.254.250]) by a.painless.aa.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>) id 1WmOgX-0004xQ-71; Mon, 19 May 2014 15:37:06 +0100
From: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <537A168F.6060600@bogus.com>
References: <20140514000750.1AF7818000E@rfc-editor.org> <797B02F7-6639-49A7-90D1-DF3C95BD1396@cisco.com> <537A168F.6060600@bogus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7"
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 15:36:57 +0100
Message-Id: <1400510218.29419.2677.camel@mightyatom>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/4TF1zBFEbsmMzZNPRepOsO5ExIU
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, "jamesrobertson@live.com" <jamesrobertson@live.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4890 (3985)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 14:37:17 -0000

Thanks,
Elwyn

On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 07:34 -0700, joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 5/18/14, 2:05 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> > I gather the erratum should be accepted. Apparently that’s your todo, Joel.
> 
> Set as verified.
> 
> Thank you.
> joel
> 
> > On May 13, 2014, at 5:07 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4890,
> >> "Recommendations for Filtering ICMPv6 Messages in Firewalls".
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> You may review the report below and at:
> >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4890&eid=3985
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> Type: Technical
> >> Reported by: James Robertson <jamesrobertson@live.com>
> >>
> >> Section: Appendix B
> >>
> >> Original Text
> >> -------------
> >> if [ "$STATE_ENABLED" -eq "1" ]
> >> then
> >>  # Allow incoming time exceeded code 0 messages
> >>  # only for existing sessions
> >>  for inner_prefix in $INNER_PREFIXES
> >>  do
> >>    ip6tables -A icmpv6-filter -m state -p icmpv6 \
> >>         -d $inner_prefix \
> >>         --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED --icmpv6-type packet-too-big \
> >>         -j ACCEPT
> >>  done
> >> else
> >>  # Allow incoming time exceeded code 0 messages
> >>  for inner_prefix in $INNER_PREFIXES
> >>  do
> >>    ip6tables -A icmpv6-filter -p icmpv6 -d $inner_prefix \
> >>         --icmpv6-type ttl-zero-during-transit -j ACCEPT
> >>  done
> >> fi
> >>
> >> Corrected Text
> >> --------------
> >> if [ "$STATE_ENABLED" -eq "1" ]
> >> then
> >>  # Allow incoming time exceeded code 0 messages
> >>  # only for existing sessions
> >>  for inner_prefix in $INNER_PREFIXES
> >>  do
> >>    ip6tables -A icmpv6-filter -m state -p icmpv6 \
> >>     -d $inner_prefix \
> >>     --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED --icmpv6-type ttl-zero-during-transit \
> >>     -j ACCEPT
> >>  done
> >> else
> >>  # Allow incoming time exceeded code 0 messages
> >>  for inner_prefix in $INNER_PREFIXES
> >>  do
> >>    ip6tables -A icmpv6-filter -p icmpv6 -d $inner_prefix \
> >>         --icmpv6-type ttl-zero-during-transit -j ACCEPT
> >>  done
> >> fi
> >>
> >> Notes
> >> -----
> >> RFC 4890 Errata ID 2706 states that icmpv6-type packet-too-big should
> >> state icmpv6-type ttl-zero-during-transmit. This should read
> >> ttl-zero-during-transit.
> >>
> >> Instructions:
> >> -------------
> >> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> RFC4890 (draft-ietf-v6ops-icmpv6-filtering-recs-03)
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> Title               : Recommendations for Filtering ICMPv6 Messages in Firewalls
> >> Publication Date    : May 2007
> >> Author(s)           : E. Davies, J. Mohacsi
> >> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> >> Source              : IPv6 Operations
> >> Area                : Operations and Management
> >> Stream              : IETF
> >> Verifying Party     : IESG
> > 
> 
>