Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Fri, 17 October 2014 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47AB1A1B59 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QrWE-1SUsbf9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C75C11A1AEA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA02660785 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 19:07:59 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 986BF6031D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 19:07:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 14600 invoked by uid 1007); 17 Oct 2014 19:07:59 +0200
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 19:07:59 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <20141017170759.GS31092@Space.Net>
References: <F5C06CAF-0AD2-4225-8EE7-FC72CE9913F0@muada.com> <755DE4C3-CDDF-41AF-BA9C-E8EC5B4DFC4C@muada.com> <543FA152.4080907@foobar.org> <9C220463-4D0E-465B-ADF5-390518F180C7@muada.com> <543FECB3.9070600@foobar.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <543FECB3.9070600@foobar.org>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/4_JpPVhcWYgpHtX7KIu0BnGl_W8
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:08:05 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 05:05:07PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 16/10/2014 16:47, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> > Growth in IPv6 more specifics was 57% last year...
> 
> 1y is an interesting data point, but shouldn't form the basis for a new
> policy.  What does the aggregate:more-specifics ratio look like over the
> last 5-8 years?

http://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/weekly/2014/41/

has a breakdown "last year" and "last 5 years" of "LIR exact", "LIR 
more-specific", "non-LIR" (=PI), "non-LIR more-specifics" - look for
the heading "Routing Table by Class of Prefix".

The "LIR exact" curve is fairly linear, while the "more specific" curve
is growing stronger than linear.  No predictions here, though.


(You've propably seen this slide deck before - it's the "IPv6 routing
table talk" numbers fed into a daily-updated cronjob)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279