Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 WGLC

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 06 August 2013 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A5921F8EA8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 19:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.821
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.821 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.222, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mROmq4DsL5nJ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 19:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AA921F8EB3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 19:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=383; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1375755887; x=1376965487; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Y1FSEWzPuatffKmwWrwMp0NmIng3PaTTT7OQV49KXSE=; b=GOWGpVJK3/YYhayMDDWSYykCAyU3DkvDOeuQBlbjgqvrKuUngKdodNlr zM5nIbRRgYZ97qeNceHujvHcC2I57GziNMJqow2smLMhfbafuRK4c12Qr WX1EOD2MgDtsXgKfthQoLdcHYnVKtIp/HvI2x3GCtDxjNYrB1CmXMu53n I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqoFAN9dAFKtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABbgwaBBYJJvDGBKBZ0giQBAQEEeRACAQgYCiQyFwENAgQOBQiICLVij2QCMQeDGXQDiHKgPYMXgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,823,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="243840528"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2013 02:24:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r762OiEH019706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 6 Aug 2013 02:24:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.235]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 21:24:43 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 WGLC
Thread-Index: AQHOkkwc/O+ewochqUWEiCocbX9qAQ==
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 02:24:42 +0000
Message-ID: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B96ECA8@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
References: <201308041800.r74I03pC023049@irp-view13.cisco.com> <3374_1375690984_51FF60E8_3374_427_1_983A1D8DA0DA5F4EB747BF34CBEE5CD15C5041E1E5@PUEXCB1C.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B96E2C5@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr13GK_cuvkt2LpJ1qJo2NR8eUnY-xfwMF_zWfe0P1mm9g@mail.gmail.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B96EAE7@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr2_d=4uD1W4WcQ82rupjVJ4UmmQAQmtSY+aQgTXmscNUw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr2_d=4uD1W4WcQ82rupjVJ4UmmQAQmtSY+aQgTXmscNUw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.119]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <BAAB347575A28149ADE43D944D92737A@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 02:25:03 -0000

On Aug 5, 2013, at 7:02 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
 wrote:
> But if it's not indended to be globally reachable... then why is it behind a NPTv6 box? I'd argue is that it *does* need to be globally reachable, but "only for certain traffic". For example, "TCP/443 replies from the Windows Update server".

Where in *my* comment did I mention a NPTv6 box?