Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient

James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com> Tue, 07 April 2015 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@nestlabs.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D241B38BD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 10:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1fFO52up54Px for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 10:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 569221B38B8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 10:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbgh1 with SMTP id gh1so95431162obb.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Apr 2015 10:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nestlabs.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TplwExgyaVggiCoI9o0ow8ux/wm7xz0pLtjUX4iBRAA=; b=TBOaGlmbIAMVFM1vfy2/Ykp4Nl3sU4dRPO+wYgDgp0yVLD0mNFlqOjnCVpKmMEP3lu IX91LDWaUtSP2jP4uYI+8DfF+Cp0lJTmcMkGcApHE1Pk3gtqc2gAq5eJ60oHauTYKKaM kK/C/galkNgDg8ohq63WY2B1wj3km3r6EW5Ko=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TplwExgyaVggiCoI9o0ow8ux/wm7xz0pLtjUX4iBRAA=; b=FsqIFvBmF23msyStGPl0MZW9GhMI8me+4VqTX82QW8BVT58NEFETr2bxbe925Jc43u KZWTp8zF/sXE0zXn4q2Nq4o+6+v4j9z4ul5wFs+Q0FUAZXBKQ7s37jgI6bLXf4oJlwzv ycMgyyETsWxKzNnEx9dt4ZrshMPusyleNwfjm5XL8uTj0Qu2xAXfUSDqHfBp6ejJXNxO zR0Xx2+0kn3zNmuvySBukwBOiqcP/pX8FWakK+Ak2ZbPoPq0bJJkkN5J1+sbkby7ZIFa 5JlK52pXae2QwlzQ6e+wl+Lzktp5SsLfGOZFylU8DKSmu7M5Xtpox2yvZZbCMEFj1vVI 3Qig==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmcRq36wSMH3kltQ4r0+fsk3JUfvD6PWo51CZ3ZpiGsYhcHEBKVOQv5yGrbiQjxhp7saJ5o
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.137.136 with SMTP id qi8mr25778562obb.51.1428427843008; Tue, 07 Apr 2015 10:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.177.229 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 10:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <552369C8.5000801@cernet.edu.cn>
References: <CAD6AjGT-hG-uvRQvRosrZtfrf0Nb8ne9jy=tD9oh=5zNM42Xsg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGS-QMi+3oVGWDxnSMhEJH=VymwcF=PwKLdwFRxwHpp_-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3Fhnx3XaXouK57gupGOzodKGb0quhQxaf76NjWxSp3WA@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe51MUB-czeCtpc63E0cHPpb_39Vv0o2Y57EVU2w_makP5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTcKgK8W+VB1H5EQpHaYiKVYXqOz_2RS-w_CiTf9kL2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe530+OVZrFZVaYh1-zoRDvJhUd0rf4sx6a2nO8SvKmm6zg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPi140PQ+TF0rED_bQPeS=Fj415qt0-zE2RdGnEL34PAzHyx6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTjXAeMF6pw5MO2Jrf9B8LJ48D3m1YTVkdBe=_OHjtroQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe51TCqU2eMP4LS3DooZxQDAPD95OVJDXbiU7qvuvKCMq+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2=zc57+pOA9TFs+0azw0ZR1g67+08T=9eZPHjGXBvgFQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe53T_30pj7xxwNs=mWEnd=do6oiq3KgN=U-gHLrLF-gG7Q@mail.gmail.com> <D1441574.4C168%wesley.george@twcable.com> <CAD6AjGQrzoBJrqQfKO0N8Ji=oJ-ZP6Sn88sXf=opJ6bYVmTDZg@mail.gmail.com> <552102B0.6070904@cernet.edu.cn> <35D97B17-8E83-43CF-ABEF-122572F1321A@eircom.net> <552369C8.5000801@cernet.edu.cn>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 10:30:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CADhXe51BDuPhc8wdKGmRiBfSnrz7PMtqYXaoDO+5cwLx_xW2tw@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c352362b978b051325c6ae"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/4r3QlYnJZO1OTu35RMlFqSRbNKY>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:30:55 -0000

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn> wrote:

>
> If all the users on the Internet can access both the IPv4 (via double and
> single translation) and IPv6 (native) contents, who cares if the IPv4
> literals will coexist with IPv4 and IPv6 for a long time?
>

You have obviously never tried to sell recurring software maintenance work
to support IPv6 transition to the management of a commercial host operating
systems vendor.


-- 
james woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
Nest Labs, Communications Engineering