IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-requirements-01

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 19 November 2012 05:06 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B60221F89C1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:06:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.938
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.938 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJ0hRrwLacjJ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:06:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F67A21F881A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:06:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ef5so4827039obb.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:06:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=uw7v7F1gCteUtnjBhP+8W6M0tbSAxSjU6HSc7Ypn+5s=; b=OfAd01h6Guj7bhSlpbGSwrSc8VrIlZQJJpYOm3RyABK8QYdc3IyB/Kgt75bpeDb6Uw FxBUpd9faZhKuGvxhF0fC2I7iX5S2j/njIygpn72EpKGTwR5b+T0IsOqkKc+LFdFJXkx rRsooK1+vAbmrboCl0TO8+mDtJNLrbaatuhRjZAGDAEasX/aSUfzNUZG0gDmCHC6exNr yE2Ju7yqAdAIAip5+601+b8wUKw/emq7C86tPG9N0LYzuWhvAiWGhecwJ4Nn0g7DeJ+U 909RJc1I8IyaQOkkJk63TU1gxa3ZVuoCyWUzxCvxTYVaIp3pX+hkW45IGUSOlpxoCHvI mAwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=uw7v7F1gCteUtnjBhP+8W6M0tbSAxSjU6HSc7Ypn+5s=; b=GLfRJWU/Igj+rBmC9SQ0uYMoFHjt7MPqVRepvHMg8wZaBVzYHx/8gqcffN2/De8LSx bm/iaGj4fzqj4W/FVNCb3O6bdCghSdoQH9cT0U1GCccJC7tFuJZbpi/9OxtWynz4suoC AoIpNbA616QgcLofibfRC0JHmsYXBfD1WsPvmkLwNjb1wf5NET6FRivtRNqK54XFMtUG P9aazaESbrAVJ3rxhHHVCSkQ00Q33oYi2orO8mn6T2LkjDYUXOnFfpMJW0zbheqodr5Z x9XvzW3n7Vx3Ud3s79zxSGAT3oJDq9iHWM03fVvadyHaaliKWdfqS0V7hKs+QQ/q1zGD Tmlw==
Received: by 10.182.127.102 with SMTP id nf6mr9863983obb.14.1353301602889; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:06:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.111.99 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:06:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2A43389B-7D02-4B9B-B2CD-A3CDC4E6E26E@gmail.com>
References: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E95C9F86C@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <2A43389B-7D02-4B9B-B2CD-A3CDC4E6E26E@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:06:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr15COHBTf2xWJQPZcnnmb9+TF=46twOrxmdN_C=_DKM-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae93b5dec506e6104ced215bd"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmEjP/hfaaMJWHVuit0C/plzMrtsRDrPfUbaxdNREvkdQCRyfXvCffzjkWS8XrTd/YWUqw3nkTXEv70noiCDw0VcXPZYDdZ+U+RNmxJ74XQOmb8u+ut7s3GFcOqWtqoPn7HEF4hQC/t6GgjuAsZtcO3wudl5qCdEnaDYBmKlN+s7J3QkTQEYLSz1ln0nygOTBw0HEL8
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Pete Vickers <pete@systemnet.no>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-requirements-01
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 05:06:44 -0000

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> wrote:

> My recollection was that overlaps were supposed to be removed and then
> concentrate on the remaining part in draft-binet-v6ops-*, no? This would
> concern requirements #1, #6, #7, #8, #9, #17, #22, #23, #25, #26, #27. My
> recommendation would be removing those and just reference to
> [draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis] because the base IPv6 compliancy would come
> from there and I see no reason to repeat those here.
>

That's what I remember from the meeting as well.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email