Re: [v6ops] PI heresy [draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 13 November 2015 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871851B2FFB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:01:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ox4p9N1NuRTz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:01:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com (mail-pa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF4621B2FFA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:01:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pacej9 with SMTP id ej9so1348581pac.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:01:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I70k5IVWAdPMJemUK5gASItx+mr9oqIIEISwTBRCL3Q=; b=SAfZ3J/ZybWqjWHbiEZrRw95JMDbz/IBtZq4DtqmWKvHualCHC4RtzxkufcOwTR2GG uSYgu3dGWFmaMWKAxvfhpPSzETDk7AcRJRRaBSdtH3WtsO2H2PbEs9kFpFuK2Mr0hYT3 fIlDfVYNr4jheFS4Bt1G4RKPTgDMDUaVZYcYBgua6lyrufXolfIeTLGHLrkUZemIWH0h GDENpz/k2wteKIzJfCGHaWRP7dVOOuDvHKQpsNwAx5XH8upjNEoxo/wI40qqVJlDd3Wy Lt/3lHsU8r7ZPZ/vDL1RK2bezUiNKv9RoJVsGvN+D7DxnsMpe0zeUKn7xilQtGwNC7Xj dEFQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.150.5 with SMTP id ue5mr19990044pab.42.1447441315596; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:01:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:7309:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:7309:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rv8sm4274165pbc.84.2015.11.13.11.01.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:01:54 -0800 (PST)
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3@u-1.phicoh.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
References: <20151106.063106.74659839.sthaug@nethelp.no> <CAO42Z2x3O8A1XKqN3PTcvM=xpF8W_WNSL1rVhHQ4ZY5HbVG=OQ@mail.gmail.com> <20151106.081425.74651560.sthaug@nethelp.no> <6ED54502-C5D1-4D09-877C-FE283E3EF142@delong.com> <5644EE46.7000805@gmail.com> <CAKr6gn1KokTGJ0cg70OR=q8Uv-1mr7TmjcYJwLVgsK_3i6tcpw@mail.gmail.com> <56453026.3090607@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1nb1svwHDE3Z7a1xF00CRw-kOrN6+Xgd6fVjqrN=gb+g@mail.gmail.com> <20151113080508.GB89490@Space.Net> <CAKD1Yr2paTyq7L8-dU9vhtxhDd17LvKPoQt4YY2DDxB-_5ZRbA@mail.gmail.com> <20151113112141.GN89490@Space.Net> <m1ZxDn5-0000EpC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <564633AB.9000509@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 08:02:03 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m1ZxDn5-0000EpC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/5VD1G6kPVyQ-RMrPtU2dUrVC55Q>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PI heresy [draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:01:57 -0000

On 14/11/2015 01:49, Philip Homburg wrote:
>> Networks break further upstream, without the actual upstream being
>> noticeable
>> broken.  Networks break certain paths, while others are working fine.
>>
>> We can do better than all-or-nothing.  We should.
> 
> I don't think a host should try to figure out which paths work and which
> don't.
> 
> Maybe somebody can come up with a simple algorithm that generalises
> happy-eyeballs and that is compatible with today's host operating systems.
> But I doubt it. 

We tried. It's called shim6. Firewalls break it.

   Brian

> 
> So while we wait for hosts to magically figure out what works and what doesn't
> (and for mobile hosts, in any possible context, even when there is
> high packet loss on the local link, etc),
> 
> I propose that routers just inform hosts which source prefixes are unusable
> according to unspecified monitoring code running on the router. (Obviously,
> routers should also propate that knowledge over internal routing protocols in
> setups with multiple routers).
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> .
>