Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Fri, 25 October 2019 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5921200DF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SE006rhVw5MF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [198.137.202.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F2EA120043 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a01:79c:cebd:47d8:9c52:20df:ffc:2b15] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:79c:cebd:47d8:9c52:20df:ffc:2b15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EBF94E11B98; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 18:10:25 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 20:10:23 +0200
Message-Id: <D329EEE8-B2F6-4A3C-9FA3-21B162F35156@employees.org>
References: <71621d5f-1525-98c0-aa94-281ac72a15cb@si6networks.com>
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-9@u-1.phicoh.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <71621d5f-1525-98c0-aa94-281ac72a15cb@si6networks.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17B5084a)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/5prMhll3soi_cXgHDve6Yd0OY-8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 18:10:28 -0000


> On 25 Oct 2019, at 20:05, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> 
> When what you call "flash-renumbering" happens, 

Yes, because what you call “renumbering “ is not specified anywhere. 

O