IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment and draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 29 March 2021 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B293A1B54 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PGl5YwIogAVA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5733A1B4E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 12THE0we025382 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:14:00 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DC03205736 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:14:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4490220571E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:14:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.14.0.104] ([10.14.0.104]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 12THDxcF032552 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:14:00 +0200
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <BL0PR05MB5316425C5650B5D2FE43DE4DAE6C9@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <59B5C1F7-48E4-4915-BAAC-41D8ADA29E8F@gmail.com> <18ea74665936408bb33f20630da95311@huawei.com> <E0757B36-8FFB-43A8-8F8B-A7F152F81156@gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <94a33c54-85f4-78be-64c4-7854e6bf07b8@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:13:59 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E0757B36-8FFB-43A8-8F8B-A7F152F81156@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/5qgTyrrNefewHtbRKLSpX_EF3rA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment and draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:14:09 -0000

about the authorship,

Le 27/03/2021 à 05:58, Fred Baker a écrit :
> 
> 
>> On Mar 19, 2021, at 1:39 AM, Paolo Volpato 
>> <paolo.volpato@huawei.com> wrote:
>> 
>> For lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison, on behalf of the authors of 
>> draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment I can say we are in favor of the WG

[...]

> The two sets of authors are disjoint. I therefore have at least nine 
> people that would like to see us adopt and publish it. What other 
> folks have opinions, pro or con?

I am not an author.

Given that large number of authors it might be possible to go with a
schema of 2 authors whose names appear on the frontpage and the others
to be Contributors listed too but not on the front page.

The authors on the frontpage could be Editors.

I think it should be possible to let open the possibility to have more
than 10 authors in the Contributors.  Maybe they would be called
Authors, not just Contributors, if that is more inline with their
expectations.

Alex

> 
> Along the same lines, are there opinions regarding the adoption of 
> draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment?
> 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a&q=%22draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison%22
>
>
>
>
> 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a&q=%22draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment%22
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list 
> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email