IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 31 January 2017 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3961299C2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:26:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q1CJ-C7VBsNB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:26:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com (mail-pf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9C8912955B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:26:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id e4so109749091pfg.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:26:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SJf8kdSxlA0xJFoxJteigDbYCCfPb2KsAMjxQKsJqQ0=; b=oCBatYgz91JFcE8DuphJ4rTV9CxY4rtM13i0LTckqLBP+mgqMgBw47/SueqdeNCnkO VPVfzh7zcctS1HVdDE/MXa7Icy8P8/4s4jkcXTPBs6ji3GAPumS9KmUyYcOaXMhrRKGf ooktmIRWPCWIudwk+KlI11kOdrpBlvFwNT6r5prMSNFWX8SRWlgJmHE0X6VO9mNd+vMv 5Nv8Y36uza4HR+VNfftoMSs6HHBfAQhE4UkJPSzjc9I5CHntYroeqzYkZG2h7WJXgRtc zQHY56NLmv6CTbVQUmbvIVV24RcSvKp9O3jtbhjRpkHerWWNKGBI0Yi/2d9cxKIDbYKe E23g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SJf8kdSxlA0xJFoxJteigDbYCCfPb2KsAMjxQKsJqQ0=; b=CZE+Jnq+6shQHR744frI4DcMVnqVG/0WgKGzdYEwLRs1GmWUwoyFyEStmyn8Ecm92q XZKmljRJiTK6osxvB4ArP1pSQkLVgwGf5Ww5i0mwpihyYQyfRexdMvF20WKrm1Y6uFFk g3eYzNN5ezuNK6jUylokH4WneBcjjMSN2SnPmrOCWVxl26lXvp0usI56ECRX9pgBtNcp LSndt6CR/JbKS40+P9al6pGlZvh+UQQtP6Tn9ilM0tURQYDZGJ0XzViM6pOIIWlsrLaf j40i338Z22SjdgsSph4WdKaJcGt7fdeBNeCv7V76pNlIP1fg/unWZnbXSoXdsjT5euHy GI6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIAal1T/imlEaqZXQvR8vMjo98WUkw5j5AdUiH4Ucj1muzBSM83zq74vzGSD2zEJw==
X-Received: by 10.98.3.3 with SMTP id 3mr30886697pfd.95.1485890782193; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:26:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] (179.218.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.218.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p6sm43164414pfg.6.2017.01.31.11.26.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:26:21 -0800 (PST)
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <BLUPR0501MB20515AFB8ECBEB3A930E9B0DAE4A0@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <b1bed263-2ac7-71c8-e9e5-ff5a3b9c4500@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:26:21 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR0501MB20515AFB8ECBEB3A930E9B0DAE4A0@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/6g7HDOzvJwKSp9mRpOswIU8oMCw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 19:26:24 -0000

Ron,

Thanks. But one nit surely:

> - Recommend against ULA-only

means

- Recommend against ULA-only (except when disconnected from the Internet)

Regards
   Brian

On 01/02/2017 04:22, Ron Bonica wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> Some time ago, I queried the WG's disposition regarding draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=v6ops&index=x6OmZJ1n2F0rBX6iq5GHRBHWRO0&gbt=1). I think that the consensus was:
> 
> - Continue as informational
> - Recommend against ULA-only
> - Attempt to find some set of recommendations upon which the WG can agree.
> 
> So, if the authors are so disposed, I encourage them to produce a new version of the draft, leveraging what we learned during this email thread.
> 
>                                                            Ron
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email