Re: [v6ops] applications that break across NAT64
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 23 September 2010 18:50 UTC
Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328E73A6AF6; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.106, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qwAWWL4VEJs2; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A693A6AEF; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rmac.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1Oyqsl-000H11-Mf; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:50:59 +0000
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:50:58 -0400
Message-ID: <m2r5gkgup9.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <00b801cb5b33$ff186680$fd493380$@com>
References: <E1OybhE-000LHx-15@psg.com> <m2sk10iy7r.wl%randy@psg.com> <00b801cb5b33$ff186680$fd493380$@com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: 'IPv6 Ops WG' <v6ops@ietf.org>, behave@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] applications that break across NAT64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:50:35 -0000
>> i need nat64, but i need one where the difficulties are not glossed >> over, please. > Perhaps something for BEHAVE's "Analysis of NAT-PT considerations with > IPv6/IPv4 translation" milestone, which is the response to v6ops's RFC4966. > Should that document describe the problem generally, or enumerate > applications which break and which work? maybe up-level and a general checklist for NATx which could then be profiled for a particular nat mess randy
- Re: [v6ops] (no subject) Randy Bush
- Re: [v6ops] applications that break across NAT64 Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] [BEHAVE] applications that break acro… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v6ops] applications that break across NAT64 Randy Bush
- Re: [v6ops] [BEHAVE] applications that break acro… Reinaldo Penno
- [v6ops] 答复: Re: [BEHAVE] applications that break … zheng.linfeng
- Re: [v6ops] [BEHAVE] 答复 : Re: applications that b… Yiu L. Lee
- [v6ops] (no subject) Jess Ger
- [v6ops] (no subject) Merlin Owens