Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment

hsyu <hsyu@cfiec.net> Tue, 23 March 2021 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <hsyu@cfiec.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEC03A1F55 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 23:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.287
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DOTGOV_IMAGE=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=1.167, IP_LINK_PLUS=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kb9kriTPJICB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 23:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpbg501.qq.com (smtpbg501.qq.com [203.205.250.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12FE33A1F56 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 23:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp24t1616480478t7r3h18w
Received: from DESKTOP-3U2VLEE (unknown [121.69.40.129]) by esmtp6.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:21:11 +0800 (CST)
X-QQ-SSF: 00400000002000406000B00A0000000
X-QQ-FEAT: xLTX91D5y3z+bsg/yJG7jHdObbGE65pWUk1I943/HOvb4zibdTGzBGlnnLAVk t2NJY0CVXw1gxMAekIMEDB/s4DcOoWWfccwcNk9opj0F5yIPo6pN+dLX7mYdXX5uVBYdcRQ BCrkRLbAz+QU0UwZ6QTEKy//4r8DJuldWOB3sKIbCgsSkCC/IAd8YJ+QyZQBwuhAqpwCBrA 4IuCldNnm/eCkfscua4NeORBTv6yLl5vdqk3GpvlD1AHyQqqM/DHi7HhXmhsEuBjqfg0N4x mn1omKYlg1Hgez6peoGoQBQDaLKcokGz7154cZGCtLiOyzHc2YyoVtxlzbvw9o6KL3BEX3w 3zEAyUDsRhn0RCVS+c=
X-QQ-GoodBg: 2
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:21:10 +0800
From: hsyu <hsyu@cfiec.net>
To: "dhruv.ietf@gmail.com" <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "paolo.volpato@huawei.com" <paolo.volpato@huawei.com>, "rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org" <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <87AACD5C-D991-4FB0-AAFC-05536C8DDE94@cfiec.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn7=swhtwqRuV6SoWoMO7jtCcPCc02XiVpAjE=VUx8CyaQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BL0PR05MB5316425C5650B5D2FE43DE4DAE6C9@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAB75xn4ioyzQ5AvUrPKVyuybjZRV__Tv1OMs70Lm-z9bo1Eo6g@mail.gmail.com> <74d6dca7019f44aba09caf47ef703e2f@huawei.com> <CAB75xn7=swhtwqRuV6SoWoMO7jtCcPCc02XiVpAjE=VUx8CyaQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MailMasterPC/4.15.2.1005 (Windows 10 19H2)
X-CUSTOM-MAIL-MASTER-SENT-ID: 2F74A1B9-6319-4E40-84C8-06086D8412B8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:cfiec.net:qybgweb:qybgweb10
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/6jlLcPSg28piIW8BUJF_M_RTYwE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 06:23:37 -0000

Hi Paolo,
           I can also provide some data on the deployment of IPv6 in China.

Best regards.

On 3/23/2021 12:40Dhruv Dhody<dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Paolo,

I think we should highlight that we do not have visibility inside the enterprises beyond the external-facing website or email and thus it is also difficult to gauge the IPv6 deployments inside enterprises.

[PV] Ok. Probably here you refer to small-medium enterprises. For large enterprises public data on the usage of IPv6 can be retrieved (Nalini, in copy, provided a good input on IPv6 in large organizations). We will better specify this point in the next version of the draft.


I had this NIST data in mind -
https://fedv6-deployment.antd.nist.gov/cgi-bin/generate-com which
includes large enterprises and relies on DNS, mail, external website.
Also, see Eric's site -
https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/detailed.php?country=in

Thanks!
Dhruv

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops