Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-17.txt - Download Booster

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

On 19/02/2015 01:56, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>> moreover together with Samsung we developed "IPv6 patch" for Download
>> Booster (Samsung feature to aggregate your LTE+WIFI connection for
>> http download -
> 
> This is a very useful feature.  I wonder whether the augmented bandwidth
> concerns a single http connection, or several?  (there is a difference
> between single connection enjoying its bandwidth augmented when an
> interface is added, and pipelined http connections not disturbing each
> other when several interfaces are added).
> 
> I am asking because two reasons.  One is that I have seen demos where
> bandwidth is not really augmented, yet pipelined http apps give a better
> feeling when multiple interfaces are used.

I know nothing about HTTP/2 beyond blog posts and the FAQ, but if they
have done what they say, HTTP/2 will make all this irrelevant.

    Brian

> 
> The other reason is that at IETF there are some activities about
> bandwidth augmentation which may be interested in Download Booster.
> 
> In the MIF Working Group there is a bandwidth augmentation activity in
> relationship to the BroadBand Forum: add a cellular interface to a DSL
> box hoping to add bandwidth, and improve fail-over.
> 
> In the Mobile IPv4 Working Group there is a
> draft-ietf-mip4-multiple-tunnel-support which may try to achieve the
> same, and an RFC for samein IPv6.
> 
>> now it works in Ipv6 networks with no DNS64 like Orange Poland )
> 
> It is encouraging :-)
> 
>> Is the network considering Machine-class devices (M2M)? For example
>> Sierra Wireless Airprime? Not really - we are working with one of the
>> vendor to deliver IPv6 (CLAT) router expected in H1/15
>>
>> More than the typical smartphone users (yes, it represents already a
>> large market) is the LTE network considering connections from more
>> dedicated settings like: connected public transportation, home
>> electricity counters, electric vehicle charging stations, harbour
>> installations, connected roads?
>>
>> Yes, we are technically ready to create "IPv6 matrix"
>>
>> These dedicated settings look up to wireless LTE access networks as
>> good hope to get on the Internet, especially in areas where land
>> lines are too expensive to deploy.
>>
>>> LTE450 -in Brasil, LTE800 - Europe
> 
> Ok, it is good to know.  For the moment we consider LTE2600 which is
> also useful in remote areas, until LTE800 comes alive.
> 
> Alex
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>