IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost a working group draft?

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 15 March 2018 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60FA1270AC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 05:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R7-yCbSb9h5k for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 05:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8F2E126B6E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 05:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 53EA1AF; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:44:49 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1521117889; bh=bED5ut+Nj2bJd1/YNoUJoP15jKeXEtzJddgbpLMYzsE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ME1s4UXYmBfQU4iNMrspR2deDtdMIKp5RbkTO9t1NEAG24kyc+13zU1V90OtkGGZ3 GyKwKmLK+A+SRKB4DR4hDmqTQnwYFgtm87mhBPMGUvC4Oj0/hNKlt8CaU2p6dj9/LM Y5ZK2Ki5X2WI9iaHoEK/CXtKFfEJ9hbuRGem3HNc=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F4B9F; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:44:49 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:44:49 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: Fred Templin <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <D27651B7-CFE5-403A-8B5E-C9D462D6F379@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803151342050.20609@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <172cd17ae54a4adba58ffcdfb522fac5@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <1af67899f24b43fa87013c61e59f0de8@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <017501d3b868$7d9a9a70$78cfcf50$@gmail.com> <9490580a13eb497ba22c19a9e360a49b@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <ddd6c6a937b342abaf5811377f88d731@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4e2c097afdd34ad2a7f31cb463704a72@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <D27651B7-CFE5-403A-8B5E-C9D462D6F379@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/6tyUIlfnx5gBnj0K8XS0KLKM1UM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost a working group draft?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:44:54 -0000

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, Fred Baker wrote:

> I would't actually agree that support for adoption is required; that 
> comes when we want to discuss adoption. And for adoption, on a mailing 
> list with 1000 people, of which 100-200 show up at meetings, four (and 
> with the author, five) doesn't constitute a consensus. What I have told 
> you is that people need to show operational interest in the draft - 
> "this would be useful in my environment". What the chairs are looking 
> for in the case of pdhost is people saying "that would be a useful model 
> for me to deploy in my data center or other environment".

Hi,

I would like to be able to delegate lots of addresses to hosts/routers, 
using something that has the properties of what we can currently do in RA, 
ie zero-lifetime things very quickly (and other aspects). I agree with 
Fred in that there is a need to do what he wants to do.

I might not agree in the exact details in his proposals, but I believe we 
should work on this problem, either here or in 6man.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email