Re: [v6ops] AWS ipv6-only features

sthaug@nethelp.no Tue, 30 November 2021 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <sthaug@nethelp.no>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78ABE3A1240 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 03:53:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e08ir2E_J2hm for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 03:53:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [IPv6:2001:8c0:9e04:500::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDB83A0776 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 03:53:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (bizet.nethelp.no [IPv6:2001:8c0:9e04:500::1]) by bizet.nethelp.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CDDE6047; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:53:37 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:53:37 +0100
Message-Id: <20211130.125337.353477644.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: pch-v6ops-11@u-1.phicoh.com
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <m1mrzjf-0000GqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
References: <CAM5+tA9JhRWfZ2VLLQnT8Mg+Xng-+Rc-oQnX8Ma5DguL2uDO8w@mail.gmail.com> <C7A86994-311E-4D94-80AE-74A15D6D62B1@delong.com> <m1mrzjf-0000GqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 26 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/7DGQYBZv2TUNBIyNk0mOzqFhJ70>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] AWS ipv6-only features
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:53:51 -0000

> Typically a hosts gets addresses from DNS. So this suggests that people
> create DNS RR sets that contains both GUAs and ULAs.
> 
> Is this common practice somewhere? Do people expect that something sensible
> will happen if you try that? Is it documented what should happen?

Putting ULA addresses into the DNS doesn't sound like a great idea. It
might work in your lab, I certainly don't expect it to work on the
global Internet.

Steinar Haug, AS2116