IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share

Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> Sun, 20 January 2013 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD8D21F84E9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:07:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.665
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.665 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LsXRaUwwufxQ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:07:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com (mail-lb0-f169.google.com [209.85.217.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D4621F84DD for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:07:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id m4so2640764lbo.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:07:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hpyC2jYcfr/tbim21t5eIqCQ/Z7+p2l+l1kMkW2Sjcw=; b=x77Yyh6GMYzBVJ6YjawxmE7oTCN2IYIz2ckWfkoPxYvXtziWHmQXdI4YTbloEdzoIj HJQgW/tW6flhuxDodHB0nwefZnvhGC2eypOEj/+/x/1WfqRchcNUG8PMABNtmZVU3fxN xBFUr1DUBF7zyj2avJriYJa/XV3U5121f1V2x0ns/aWsukZqtCDyXjAxLWTo+4EGjb56 B1uo+Q523hKwdS6KWp2DW6FkqLty0ID8X6gro9gNeYukzaO9DDWjg1A34gFGAP+ck79s tY7aRMwosC/Pvx7QmypypUgdhMI7OL1eGKbz1we1c3mpdwEpnn0shywaECpSMqLba6vQ owhQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.38.67 with SMTP id e3mr6264618lbk.105.1358701660299; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:07:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.44.36 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:07:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.44.36 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:07:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1358681491.98785.YahooMailNeo@web142502.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
References: <CAD6AjGSEOva1RzDXJqmstFk=13JnPUSWM9rQ3PmXCXPQQwcBDQ@mail.gmail.com> <1358681491.98785.YahooMailNeo@web142502.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:07:40 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGRFh1ZrnHpFqbaaOWVFQ-L7NHaW1H8PkV==uJVoBqLCZQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e0cb4efe2c24d1613a04d3bb61e8"
Cc: v6ops v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:07:42 -0000

Mark,

Just on the this one topic

<Snip>

> Actually, reviewing the IPv6 Addressing Model in RFC4291, it says, "An
IPv6 unicast address refers to a single interface."
>

Should we explicitly call it anycast then? Is that worth noting in the
draft, citing  tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.6

CB

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email