IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] smartphone v6-v4 conversions affect video-conf quality?

Henri Alves de Godoy <henri.godoy@fca.unicamp.br> Tue, 20 October 2020 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <henri@unicamp.br>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4987D3A0B39 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 06:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.877
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.877 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fca-unicamp-br.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2nIqy8llQybw for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 06:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd44.google.com (mail-io1-xd44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BDE83A0B38 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 06:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd44.google.com with SMTP id b15so3152785iod.13 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 06:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fca-unicamp-br.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:cc; bh=0uLwM6X38nMjFdFkPf0A9KPfW2TQzV66xx0K7A2vrqA=; b=rbi089R/kE0FPd3mI0kaml1ozpF9suP1Kq0lv/oeZB3y2ojtmnCd7R+U1Q50NP8j3M 87VRzcl5ownnDKVRznUwrHM4IH0MiIfM46q6h96LxCEoksqXqhEYXGuSzMjFlWIjdeuc uRFjbyo9Y24znqZBQg37RZGDAk8cFxdSz2OYRg1yq0fnFhqOEBRPjSTtahwltvkx46pA nv1GKh8D8NfWrj83L4//mJRjCbL7WYqGbGlS60DFZ1eDY8QmX2MBRSa1yB3AbbcOcLRw ej92lPpw8G1U2mqWeCyftRP2e9pqR6PRHPSv6Hrx7IimBgNayv4YC8/31umT5Zwnmwr5 HLVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:cc; bh=0uLwM6X38nMjFdFkPf0A9KPfW2TQzV66xx0K7A2vrqA=; b=sr9afDY6efFdHm/JXUXtmyz8xN9NfyXkCXu6Lk7PWmkY3t9wkDzVSFUPu1Q5pz3Fss mtbC00dJ95Yo52qdNPK4B3nijSJiMoGQLMJyBPw+HCivQ4NVaYmob1YqxdV3btB+ti3I zVs1lFXI7H4BHcS+6BZtwWsxOOJxuhCXEvzktdKZeh8+PSwhtxG68SPn7KnvBt7bYXBu ru7g7GcheaC9OKNnjik79huBV5F0D/bV2BxvUx1DZfeUN1wdP3LrVe3oOVfXDbosJesP kdZDlqV/XCODLEWEKpn1lSpDEqnOgBSg2oBvKHvriUJATsTxQ2JR5xyrgPGEfhZfEiqj gZ7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531icLshCG28Z402LIpYzX0GX72JNHyP9opH4RqIkdYPFRKvCxaM Okj1MCcsYeaLM3Valf91sLQLI5U35Gg/GKdTDJTxzA==
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:2cc5:: with SMTP id s188mt205363ios.63.1603199829052; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 06:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <e6352492-030b-7f0a-4fd5-6298555458eb@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2010201434160.15604@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CALRKgT6CeTGMUL439WStQcDanadpX7tBmG5KUu3NhGedPo5VSA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALRKgT6CeTGMUL439WStQcDanadpX7tBmG5KUu3NhGedPo5VSA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Henri Alves de Godoy <henri.godoy@fca.unicamp.br>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:16:54 -0300
Message-ID: <CALRKgT6PLuc9_LgJKEeW1zTvLYx_+tPoPweJdxXmeF_Bi7JP8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000051094305b21a0c60"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/7zL3Ym9ONEeeRxv4RZpAYamJDBE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] smartphone v6-v4 conversions affect video-conf quality?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:17:13 -0000

Hi Alexandre,

This subject is very interesting and I recently made some measurements
using 464XLAT to access the web and the differences in microseconds between
an ipv4 and ipv6 access were imperceptible for an end user. (4 to 10 μs).

The problem that makes any attempt to measure difficult is that many video
applications are not yet entirely on IPv6. The authentication systems of
the services are still in IPv4 and few like Microsoft Teams do not have
their IPv6 video transmission as far as I could verify.

Henri Alves Godoy
Information Technology and Communication
School of Applied Sciences
University of Campinas - UNICAMP
Fone: + 55 (19) 3701-6682

>
>
>
> Em ter., 20 de out. de 2020 às 09:36, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike=
> 40swm.pp.se@dmarc.ietf.org> escreveu:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2020, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>>
>> > I wonder whether such a smartphone would get a better quality of video
>> > if the video-call service was on IPv6, and thus no IPv4-IPv6 conversion.
>>
>> That depends on the network in question, if there is higher RTT going
>> through for instance NAT64 device. The actual L4 user payload of the
>> packets will be identical for both cases, the NAT64 doesn't change that.
>>
>> --
>> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email