IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Hey guys, was Re: Please review the No IPv4 draft

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Wed, 30 April 2014 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494011A0852 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kL-4x-MIA_0U for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EC71A04B6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mb-aye.local ([173.247.205.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s3UI3K6Z005634 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:03:21 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <53613AE8.3050405@bogus.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:03:20 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/29.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <534BF5A5.5010609@viagenie.ca> <534BFA08.3030404@foobar.org> <49EA8AC9-D5C5-4FE5-9A10-0CD574782F0F@nominum.com> <534C07FC.8000907@foobar.org> <F08AF14D-22C6-4F4C-9388-670EB4CD8453@nominum.com> <F2A0EC2F-6B41-4560-88BA-CEBF3E921B61@delong.com> <CAEmG1=oK8iHAms2_uVBsCtpCG7xBdhRfh9QQrd+JXUXgjBPqPA@mail.gmail.com> <0901D65B-EA79-4E20-987D-9BA01CEDDAB3@delong.com> <B3942C2F-C08E-42F2-9038-92C3C63E0023@nominum.com> <5360B37B.8010908@dougbarton.us> <F350FDDA-645B-42B3-90EB-70D8852E8435@nominum.com> <5361387A.5070805@dougbarton.us>
In-Reply-To: <5361387A.5070805@dougbarton.us>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PaUuQNkOB4UnXLJ0q8vxRfpbkOcR1JxR1"
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:03:21 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/848wxRRJloMbOTyD_6bT6EAhdiA
Subject: [v6ops] Hey guys, was Re: Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:03:24 -0000

I think this discussion has served it's purpose with respect to review
of the no ipv4 draft.

We can go away an work on this.

Thanks
joel

On 4/30/14, 10:52 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 05:37 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> On Apr 30, 2014, at 4:25 AM, Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> wrote:
>>> as others have pointed out this is layering violation of monumental
>>> proportions
>>
>> Are you trolling me, Doug?
> 
> I'm not sure why you would say that, or why you would snip one phrase
> out of my entire e-mail to respond to and ignore all of the other
> arguments I made about why this draft is a bad idea.
> 
> Doug
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email